|
Secondo nuovi studi, nel 1978 un
vaccino della polio prodotto, almeno, da un laboratorio
dell'Europa dell'Est è stato infetto da un
virus in grado di
causare il cancro.
Si pensava che i rami vaccinali contenenti questo
virus e
risalenti al 1962 fossero stati ripuliti grazie alle moderne
procedure di manifattura. La scoperta indica invece che, a
dispetto di quanto si pensasse, nel frattempo 400 milioni di
persone erano state esposte al rischio del virus.
vedi: Minaccia nascosta nel
Vaccino per la Polio
Il patologo Michele Carbone insieme ad altri colleghi
dell'Università di Loyola di Chicago ha testato la presenza
del contaminante SV40 su
campioni della EEVM, il laboratorio manifatturiero
dell'Europa del dell'Est appunto, e su altri campioni
prodotti in 12 altri paesi.
Come riportato dal numero del Cancer Research del 15
novembre scorso, tutti gli stock risultavano negativi al
virus a parte un innumerevole quantità di campioni
provenienti dalla EEVM. Ciò dimostra che per più di una
decade - dal 1966 al 1978 – è circolato sul mercato uno
stock del vaccino contro la polio positivo all'infezione del
virus SV40.
Ma cos'è questo SV40 ?
Per produrre abbastanza
virus della polio, ai fini di creare
il vaccino, i laboratori facevano sviluppare il virus stesso
nelle cellule renali delle scimmie rhesus. Fattore
sconosciuto ai ricercati di quel tempo, le scimmie di questa
famiglia sono spesso infette dal
SV40, un virus in
grado di causare il cancro negli umani.
Le partiture del virus contro la polio ottenute utilizzando
le cellule dei
Rhesus furono a breve termine e in larga
misura infettate con il SV40. Quando il problema fu scoperto
nel 1959 la maggior parte dei laboratori eliminarono tale
virus dai vaccini con un siero anti SV40.
Invece il laboratorio europeo di produzione citato - EEVM -
e forse altri, pensarono di scaldare la mistura del vaccino
della polio per inattivare il virus isolato. I ricercatori
hanno ora dimostrato che la tecnica di inattivazione
attraverso il calore, utilizzata dal laboratorio in
questione, non distrugge in modo adeguato il SV40 ed è stata
la ragione evidente del perseverare negli anni della
presenza dell'infezione nel mistura stessa del loro vaccino.
Per prevenire future contaminazioni i
produttori di vaccini
passarono da colture sulla scimmia Rhesus a colture sulle
cosiddette "scimmie verdi" resistenti al virus SV40.
Resta ancora sconosciuto l'effetto del vaccino infetto sul
propagarsi del cancro.
Tratto da:
http://www.scienzaeconoscenza.it
vedi: Cancro e
Medicina Naturale
Commento NdR: anche se i luminari, ricercatori,
medici della
medicina ufficiale
allopatica, continuano ad insegnare che i
virus sono
cause di malattia, e/o come in questo caso, affermano che
certi virus sono cancerogeni, la verita' e' che i
virus
sono SOLO la conseguenza e NON la
causa dell'ammalamento
(anche del cancro)
ECCO la CONFERMA dei
CDC
Il CDC ha ammesso
che tra il 1955-1963 più di 98 milioni di americani hanno
ricevuto una o più dosi di un vaccino per la poliomielite
che è stato contaminato da un virus cancerogeno chiamato
virus Simian 40 (SV40). I CDC hanno cancellato rapidamente
cio’ che trovate qui sotto nella pagina, insieme a Google,
ma il documento del sito è stato fortunatamente memorizzato
nella cache e salvato, per simboleggiare ed affermare questa
grande ammissione.
Ma in realta' quei vaccini furono utilizzati fino ai primi
degli anni '80, per cui gli intossicati da quella proteina
tossica a DNA (SV40) furono in realta' centinaia di milioni
nei soli US ed in Europa circa 400.000 furono contaminati da
quella sostanza tossica cancerogena !
Today’s
Polio Vaccine still contaminated with Cancer-Causing SV-40
A
bombshell was dropped less than an hour ago at the Third International
Conference on Vaccine Safety hosted by the National Vaccine Information
Centre in Washington D.C.
Stanley
Kops, a lawyer who has had his information on polio vaccines published in
peer-reviewed medical journals and who has presented data at the Institute
of Medicine (IOM) conference on SV-40 in mid-2002 (results published in
October 2002), has produced proof positive that the oral polio vaccine has
always been contaminated with SV-40, a monkey virus which has been linked
by the FDA and other organisations with cancers such as mesothelioma
and meduloblastoma.
Since
1963, we have been assured that polio vaccines have not contained this
deadly contaminant.
Stanley Kops shows that not only is this not the case, but that the
vaccine regulators
who are charged with keeping our families safe, have known all along that
SV-40 was never removed from vaccines.
The rate
of childhood cancers have
skyrocketed since the early 1960’s. Have we been unwittingly exposing
our children to one of the most feared illnesses by trying to protect them
from polio with a vaccine that many European countries have never used
because of the known dangers associated with them ?
The
AVN want to know what else we have not been told about vaccines
?
The
AVN calls for:
An
immediate Australian Government investigation into how vaccines are tested
and approved before they are introduced into this country.
Legislation
to require the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) to conduct tests
before approval of vaccines which they currently do not do.
Mandating
that the Australian government, which currently spends hundreds of
millions of dollars a year to fund unproven vaccines, provide funding for
independent studies on all vaccines for content and contaminents.
By Meryl
Dorey: E-Mail:
meryl@avn.org.au
La
Merck ammette l'inoculazione
del virus del cancro -
La divisione vaccini della farmaceutica Merck,
ammette l'inoculazione del virus del cancro per
mezzo dei
vaccini.
La sconvolgente intervista censurata, condotta
dallo studioso di storia medica Edward Shorter
per la televisione pubblica di Boston WGBH e la
Blackwell Science, è stata tagliata dal libro "The
Health Century" a causa dei sui contenuti -
l'ammissione che la Merck ha tradizionalmente
iniettato il virus (SV40 ed altri) nella
popolazione di tutto il mondo.
Questo filmato contenuto nel documentario "In
Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood & Bioterrorism",
prodotto e creato liberamente dalle
associazioni di tutela dei
consumatori e dall'esperto di salute
pubblica, Dr. Leonard Horowitz,
caratterizza l'intervista ad uno dei maggiori esperti di
vaccini del mondo, il Dott. Maurice
Hilleman, che spiega perché la Merck ha diffuso
l'AIDS, la
leucemia e altre orribili piaghe nel
mondo:
CANCRO Trasmesso con i VACCINI
dalla
Merck
Quello che sembrava il frutto di uno
“stupido visionario” o di un
“complottista” è invece una realtà
terrificante con la quale bisogna
confrontarsi e porsi almeno il
dubbio che qualcosa di vero ci sia.
Un’azienda farmaceutica ha
confessato di aver inoculato il
cancro tramite vaccini. Grazie a
qualche ricerca sul web siamo stati
in grado di recuperare la scioccante
intervista realizzata da Edward
Shorter per la televisione pubblica
di Boston WGBH, inserita anche nel
libro “The
Health Century”.
Secondo quanto riferito
nell’intervista e riprodotto nel
volume di Shorter “l’azienda
farmaceutica Merck avrebbe iniettato
il
virus SV40, capace di provocare
il cancro, nella popolazione di
tutto il mondo”.
Ecco perché, questa è la conclusione
di Shorter, negli ultimi 50 anni
l’insorgenza dei tumori è diventata
una piaga mondiale.
L’intervista – contenuta nel
documentario “In
Lies we trust: the CIA, Hollywood
and Bioterrorism”, prodotto dal
Dott. Leonard Horowitz – vede la
presenza del maggior esperto di
vaccini al mondo, il Dott. Maurice
Hilleman, che ha lavorato per
diversi anni proprio alla Merck ed è
morto in circostanze sospette l’11
aprile del 2005.
Hilleman ha rivelato cosa c’è dietro
la diffusione di malattie come Hiv,
leucemia e cancro e ha posto in
correlazione la diffusione di queste
malattie con l’inoculazione dei
vaccini.
A conferma di questa incredibile e
clamorosa confessione c’è una
sentenza della Corte Suprema delle
Filippine, che nel 1995 ha dato
ragione all’associazione Catholic
Women`s League: secondo l’accusa i
vaccini anti tetano contenevano
l’ormone B-hCG, utilizzato con lo
scopo di rendere sterili le donne
cui vi si sottoponevano. La notizia
è stata
confermata dalla Central Connecticut
State University.
LEGGI l’ESTRATTO del LIBRO di
SHORTER sulla MERCK
Clicca
QUI per scaricare e stampare il
pdf.
Vedi anche i 2 videos qui:
http://www.infiltrato.it/inchieste/ammissione-shock-di-un-azienda-farmaceutica-cancro-trasmesso-con-i-vaccini-ecco-le-prove/
Nei vaccini venduti al terzo mondo si é
scoperto che molti di questi contenevano
l'ormone B-hCG un anti fertile se
immesso in un
vaccino.
La corte Suprema delle Filippine ha scoperto
che oltre 3 milioni di ragazze e donne hanno
assunto questi vaccini contaminati, cosí
come in Nigeria, Tailandia ecc...
Per chi non abbia ancora visto questi
video-documenti scioccanti:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=edikv0zbAlU
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=wg-52mHIjhs&feature=related
Sembrerebbe che oltre al profitto a tutti i
costi, ci sia dietro qualcosa d'altro....impedire
alle donne dei paesi del terzo
mondo... di avere figli....
I
Vaccini
creano
Mutazioni Genetiche
nei
Mitocondri delle
cellule, mutazioni che
sono trasmissibili alla prole,
dalla via materna. Nelle cellule
infettate da virus si
risvegliano
i retrovirus piu’ vecchi.
Dei ricercatori hanno osservato che
quando il metabolismo della cellula
infettata da un virus (NdR: che puo’
essere anche
vaccinale) essa viene
ingannata al fine di riprodurre il
virus che la infetta, pero’ in essa decade
la funzionalità di alcune
reazioni biochimiche di contenimento
e di funzione cellulare:
sintesi e specializzazione delle
proteine,
specializzazione degli
enzimi e
duplicazione del
DNA.
Quindi anche l'infezione
da virus
vaccinale e’ in grado
quindi di riattivare genomi di
precedenti virus, o di quelli
iniettati
con i vaccini ai genitori,
nonni, avi del vaccinato, virus, che
erano divenuti parte del genoma
delle cellule dei genitori, nonni,
avi, generando anticipatamente
qualsiasi tipo di patologia; il
meccanismo si chiama
slatentizzazione = liberare
anticipatamente patologie.
Di fatto i
Vaccini sono un
cocktail di Tossine
altamente
pericolose che possono
rimanere inerti per anni e
riesplodere come
bombe a
tempo anche dopo 30-40
anni o piu’, in uno stato febbrile…
che alterano il
Terreno in modo
importante, specie negli organismi
non perfettamente sani, per problemi
ereditari e/o di alimentazione
inadatta alla Perfetta Salute.
NON-ASBESTOS RELATED DIFFUSE MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA - Tumori, 88: 1-9, 2002
Michael Huncharek - Division of Radiation Oncology,
Department of Clinical Oncology, Marshfield Clinic,
Marshfield, WI; Meta-Analysis Research Group, Stevens
Point, WI Correspondence to: Michael Huncharek, MD,
MPH, Department of Clinical Oncology Marshfield Clinic
Cancer Center, c/o St Michael’s Hospital Cancer Center, 900
Illinois Avenue Stevens Point, WI 54481. Tel +715-343-3035;
fax +715-343-3080; e-mail
metaresearch@hotmail.com
Received August 28, 2001; accepted October 31, 2001
SV-40 and
mesothelioma
SV40 is a polyomavirus that causes asymptomatic infections
in Asiatic macaques
53. This
virus is known to induce tumors in rodents
54. and
is related to the human polyomaviruses BKV and JCV5. These
latter two viruses commonly cause asymptomatic human
infection with 70-80% of adults being seropositive
56.
Although polyomavirus are considered species specific, SV40
was demonstrated to infect and transform human cell in vitro
by Shein and Enders
57. By
the time these findings were discovered, poliovirus vaccines
were prepared in the United States using Rhesus monkey
kidney cells. It is estimated that contamination of Salk
poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in the mid-1950’s and early 1960’s
may have resulted in exposure of upwards of 100 million US
citizens to SV40. The preparation of vaccine using macaque
monkey cells was abandoned and African Green monkey cells
were subsequently employed. These cells were found to be
free of indigenous viruses.
The
relationship and concern over SV40 and malignant
mesothelioma stems from early work that identified SV40 like
DNA in human tumors. Bersagel et al. in 1992
58. found
DNA sequences in childhood choroid plexus tumors and
ependymomas identical to a portion of the SV40 large T
antigen (Tag). Their initial studies were repeated using PCR
primers for SV40, similar results were found. Seven of
eleven tumor samples also stained immunohistochemically for
Tag. Since SV40 was found to induce pleural mesotheliomas in
hamsters
59,
Carbone et al. extended their findings to human tumors
60. In a
series of 48 human mesotheliomas, SV40 like DNA sequences
were found in 29 of 48 samples but in only 1 of 28 lung
tissue samples from the same patients. No such sequences
were identified in 48 other non-mesothelial solid tumors.
Since this early work was first published, numerous other
laboratories have reported the presence of SV40,in human
mesotheliomasm61,62 For instance, Cristaudo et al.
63.
studies 18 paraffin embedded mesotheliomas using PCR and
Southern blot hybridization for the DNA regulatory region of
SV40. Approximately 55% of the tumor samples contained SV40
regulatory sequences with 80% containing Tag sequences.
McLaren et al.
64.
examined malignant mesothelioma cell lines and tumor tissue
derived from Australian patients. Five cell lines were
established in the investigators laboratory from pleural
fluid of mesothelioma patients.
Seven
tumor biopsy specimens were also obtained via Tru-cut biopsy
needles. The investigators employed three different sets of
primers, ie Svfor2/Svrev, Svfor3/Svrev and Sv8/9. These
primers allowed amplification of DNA from the five
mesothelioma cell lines and demonstrated the presence of
SV40 like sequences. Likewise, SV40 like sequences were also
found in all seven biopsy specimens. The authors noted the
existence of differences in sensitivity across primers used
with the Svfor2/Svrev primers the least sensitive. Such
differences may contribute to varying inter-laboratory
detection rates.
Several studies provide some indirect support for the theory
that SV40 exposure is, in fact, related to exposure via
contaminated polio vaccine. Hirvonen et al.
65.
examined tumor tissue from 49 Finnish mesothelioma patients
born between 1912 and 1953. Most of these patients had been
occupationally exposed to asbestos. In Finland, polio
vaccination began in 1957 and no SV40 contaminated vaccine
was used. None of the Finnish samples tested positive for
SV40 like sequences using PCR and Southern blotting. Five
mesothelioma samples from US patients were also blindly
analyzed with three found positive for SV40 DNA. A similar
study was conducted by Emri et al. in Turkey
66. Both
asbestos and environmental exposure to fibrous zeolite are
the major causes of mesothelioma in Turkey. As in Finland,
polio vaccines distributed in Turkey were apparently SV40
free, as polio vaccination programs did not begin until 1970
at which time all preparations were uncontaminated. Using
PCR, none of 29 Turkish specimens tested positive for SV40
DNA while a positive control mesothelioma sample obtained
from Italy tested positive. A caveat that needs to be
considered regarding the Turkish data is a recent study by
Roushdy-Hammady et al.
67. Some
areas of Turkey suffer extremely high incidence rates of
malignant mesothelioma such as Karain where incidence rates
can range from 5,000 to 50,000 cases per million
68.
Zeolite used in building materials as well as asbestos
exposure contributes to this high rate of disease.
Nonetheless, the study by Roushdy-Hammady et al. suggests
that genetic susceptibility may play an important role in
the pathogenesis of mesothelioma in this region. The authors
constructed genetic epidemiology maps and analyzed a
six-generation pedigree of 526 individuals. Their analysis
suggested that mesothelioma might be genetically transmitted
in an autosomal dominant fashion. It is questionable though,
whether reliable pedigrees could be constructed over so many
generations. Mesothelioma remains a difficult pathological
diagnosis under the best of circumstances. The
Roushdy-Hammady data should therefore be interpreted
caustiously.
As reviewed earlier, the available data on the role that
genetic susceptibility may play in the development of
malignant mesothelioma is sparse. Genetic factors may be
more important than currently appreciated. Interpretation of
the SV40 data is difficult in the absence of more definitive
information of the genetic characteristics of this disease.
Other work argues against a clear role for vaccine derived
SV40 and mesothelioma. In a report by Butel et al.69 the
authors follow up on a previous study from their laboratory
dealing with human brain and bone tumors
58. These
authors examined brain and bone tumors (osteosarcomas)
using PCR using primers from four separated regions of the
SV40 genome. SV40 DNA was found in both human and bone
tumors and sequencing studies ruled out contamination as a
source. There also were differences across samples in
the C-terminal sequences of the Tag genes, which argues
against contamination from a single source. The authors were
unable to determine the source of SV40 DNA. All tumors
analyzed were from patients born after 1965 with some born
as late as the mid-1980’s. Therefore, exposure via
contaminated polio vaccine could not have occurred.
Their
data suggest that humans may be infected by various
“strains” of SV40 that have previously been unrecognized.
There was no indication that a particular viral strain was
tumor specific.
Supporting evidence from large-scale epidemiological studies
would provide much needed additional evidence to support a
causal connection between SV40 from polio vaccine and
malignant mesothelioma.
Strickler
et al.70 published the results of large-scale cohort study
of birth cohorts dating back to the 1950’s.
The incidence of ependymoma, osteosarcoma and mesothelioma
incidence and mortality data were examined among infants
born between 1956 and 1962, children born between 1947 and
1952 (childhood exposure) and unexposed children born
between 1964 and 1969.
Statistical methods were used to determine whether incidence
rates varied according to birth cohort. Overall, there were
at least 45 million person-years of observation for each of
the three cohorts. The exposed groups did not experience
increased incidence of cancer compared to the non-exposed
groups. None of the relative risks for ependymoma, brain
tumors of all types, osteosarcomas or mesotheliomas showed
statistically significant associations with SV40 exposure.
The authors point out that, “The birth cohorts of interest…
have not yet reached the age at which most mesotheliomas
occur, resulting in few cases and imprecise estimates of
risk.
Incidence data show that mesothelioma rates have been
increasing during the past several decades. It is important
to note, though, that similar increases have also occurred
in Sweden, where adults never received SV-40 contaminated
poliovirus vaccines, suggesting that other factors common to
industrialized nations. …Appear adequate in explaining the
observed increases in mesothelioma incidence rates
71”.Geissler et al. 72 reported a study conducted in
Germany following immunization of over 700,000 infants with
SV40 contaminated polio vaccine between 1959 and 1961. With
twenty-two years of follow up, no increase in cancer
incidence was found among the SV40 exposed birth cohort
versus an unexposed birth cohort from 1962-1964.
The long observation period and large sample size are
particularly important features of this study.
Overall, the data linking SV40 exposure and malignant
mesothelioma are equivocal. Differences in viral detection
across laboratories suggests that technical differences
influence the “yield” of positive findings. The
demonstration of SV40 in tumors from patients not exposed to
contaminated virus suggests other routes of human infection
exist. In the case of children with ependymomas for
instance, maternal fetal transmission may account for such
findings
73. The
work of Butel et al. presents an interesting argument of the
existence of other strains of SV40 that can infect humans
69. These data require confirmation and have important
implications for drawing causal connections between
“authentic SV40” exposure and human tumors.
5. McDonald JC, McDonald AD: Epidemiology of mesothelioma
from estimated incidence. Prev Med, 6: 426-446, 1977.
53. Eddy BE, Borman GS, Berkeley WH, Young RD: Tumors
induced in hampsters by injection of rhesus monkey kidney
cell extracts. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 107: 191-197, 1961.
54. Diamandopoulos GT. Induction of lymphocytic leukemia,
lymph sarcoma, reticulum cell sarcoma and estrogenic sarcoma
in Syrian golden hampster by oncogenic DNA simian virus 40.
JNCI, 50: 1347-1365, 1973.
55. Hogan TF, Padgett BL, Walker DL: Human polyoma viruses.
In: Textbook of Human Virology. Belshe RB (Ed) pp 970-1000
Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, MO, 1997.
56. Gardner S: Prevalence in England of antibody to human
polyoma virus (BK). Br Med J, 1: 77-78, 1973.
57. Shein HM, Ender JF: Transformation induced by simian
virus 40 in human renal cell cultures. I. Morphology and
growth characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 48: 1164-1172,
1962.
58. Bergsagel DJ, Finegold FJ, Butel JS, Kumpskey WJ, Garcea
RL: DNA sequences similar to those of simian virus 40 in
ependymomas and choroids plexus tumors of childhood. New
Engl J Med, 326: 988-993, 1992.
59. Cicala C,
Pompetti F, Carbone M: SV40 induces mesotheliomas in
hamsters. Am J Path, 142: 1524-1533, 1993.
60. Carbone
M, Pass H, Rizzlo P, Marinetti MR, DiMusio MD, Mews DJY,
Levine AS, Procopio A: Simian virus 40 like DNA sequences in
human pleural mesothelioma. Oncogene, 9: 1781-1790, 1994.
61. Griffiths
DJ, Nicholson AG, Weiss RA: Detection of SV40 sequences in
human mesothelioma. Dev Biol Stand, 94: 127- 136, 1998.
62. Pass HI,
Donington JS, Wu P, Rizzo P, Nishimura M, Kennedy RC,
Carbone M: Human mesotheliomas contain the simian virus 40
regulatory region and large tumor antigen DNA sequences. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 116: 854-859, 1998.
63. Cirstando A, Powers A,
Vivaldi A, Foddes R, Fugliemlo G, Gattini V, Buselli R,
Sensales G, Ciancia E, Ottenga F: SV40
can be reproducibly detected in paraffin embedded
mesothelioma samples. Anticancer Res, 20: 895-898, 2000.
64. McLaren
BR, Haenel T, Stevenson S, Mukherjee S, Robinson BWS, Lake
RA: Simian virus 40 like sequences in cell lines and tumor
biopsies from Australian malignant mesothelioma. Aust N Z J
Med, 30: 450-456, 2000.
65. Hirvonen
A, Mattson K, Karjalainen A, Ollikainen T, Tammilehto L,
Hovi T, Vaino H, Pass HI, DiResta I, Carbone M, Linnainmaa
K: Simian virus 40 (SV40) like DNA sequences not detectable
in Finnish mesothelioma patients not exposed to SV40
contaminated polio vaccines. Mol Carcinog, 26: 93- 99, 1999.
66. Emri
S,Kocagoz T, Olut A, Gungen Y, Mutti L, Baris I: Simian
virus 40 is not a cofactor in the pathogenesis of
environmentally induced malignant pleural mesothelioma in
Turkey. Anticancer Res, 20: 891-894, 2000.
67.
Roushdy-Hammady, Siegel J, Emri S, Testa JR, Carbone M:
Genetic susceptibility factor and malignant mesothelioma in
the Cappadocian region of Turkey. Lancet, 357: 444-445,
2001.
68. Berry G:
Epidemiology of mesothelioma. In: Preventing cancer, M
Tattersall (Ed), pp. 35-44, Australian Professional
Publications, Sidney, 1988.
69. Butel JS,
Jafar S, Stewart AR, Lednicky JA: Detection of authentic
SV40 DNA sequences in human brain and bone tumors. Dev Biol
Stand, 94: 22-23, 1998.
70. Strickler
HD, Rosenberg P, Devesia SS, Fraumeni JF, Goedert JJ: The
contamination of poliovirus vaccines with simian virus 40
(1955-1963) and subsequent cancer rates in the United
States. JAMA, 279: 292-295, 1998.
71. Strickler
HD, Goedert JJ: Exposure to SV40 contaminated poliovirus
vaccine and the risk of cancer. A review of the
epidemiological evidence. Dev Biol Stand, 94: 235-244, 1998.
72. Geissler
F: SV40 and human brain tumors. Prog Med Virol, 37: 211-222,
1990.
73. Strickler
HD, Goedert JJ, Fleming M, Travis WD, Williams AE, Rabkin
CS, Daniel RW, Shah KV: Simian virus 40 and pleural
mesothelioma in humans. Cancer Epi Bio Prev, 5:473-475,
1966.
http://www.tumorionline.it/allegati/00198_2002_01/fulltext/1_01_02.pdf
|
