|
Studies on the Interaction Between Electromagnetic Fields and Living Matter Neoplastic
Cellular Culture Case 7
Patient
S. A., male, age 44, was diagnosed with peritoneal carcinosis
in 1989, having a mass with a maximum diameter of 40 cm. An echograph report
in 1990 stated: “
. . .liver...
with dishomogeneous structure due to secondary iocalizations, the
largest of which in the left lobe has a diameter of about 4 cm.
...Kidneys
had moderate dilatation of the calico pieliche structures. Upper and
lower abdomen was completely occupied by expansive formation of mixed
structure, part liquid, part solid that compresses also the bladder and does
not permit a precise evaluation of the bladder wails and the prostate.”
The patient was inoperable and underwent treatment in 1990 with electromagnetic
energy.
The echograph report in 1991 stated: “...the iiver is enlarged
with diffused dishomogeneous structure.
Definite signs of nodular lesions
are not identifiable at different acoustic impedances... The pelvis and
partially the abdomen are occupied by a voluminous expansive formation with
a maximum longitudinai diameter of approximately 20 cm., with an
echostructure that is strongiy dishomogeneous, referabie to
discariocinetic lesions. The bladder appears to have conserved regular
walls. The dimensions and the echostructure of the prostate are within
normai limits.”
Case 8
Patient
N. M., female, age 56, was diagnosed with lobular carcinoma of the breast
in 1988.
She underwent a surgical operation and chemotherapy. At the time of
the treatment with electromagnetic energy in 1991, she was suffering
from a serious decline of general health, a hepatic metastasis of 3.3 cm
diameter, and other disseminated hepatic parenchima metastases and a costal metastasis.
The treatment lasted almost two months during which time the main hepatic
localization reduced to a diameter of about 3 cm., and the other metastases
disappeared. The upper abdominal echotomograph report in 1991 stated,
“an hypoechogenous area is visible, with irregular margins and a diameter
of 3.3 cm. referable, as first hypothesized, to metastases and numerous
other hypoechogenous areas.
” An echography report described “a delimited
hypoechogenous nodular formation, with a diameter of 3 cm, of irregular
shape and a endoiesional hypereflectant formation...” The remaining
parenchima did not show alterations of the echogenous structure. In Figure
14, a bone scintigraphy, taken in 1991, shows the costal localization.
Figure 15 shows the examination made in 1992, in which it was pointed out,
“the anomalous finding, reported in the previous examination of 28 Jan
1991 is practicaily no longer recognizable; the other parameters,
within formai limits, have not varied.”
fig. 14 -
fig. 15 Figure 14 and 15 show
the x-rays before and after the treatment Case
9
Patient
D. A., female, age 69, was diagnosed with papiliary cistoadenocarcinoma of
the ovary, metastatic and infiltrating in 1987. Chemotherapy was performed,
butto no avail. When the patient was subjected to electromagnetic therapy
in 1990, she had metastases in the peritoneum, and the echograph showed
that the “the parametrium appeared to be occupied by a voluminous mass
with a diameter of about 15 cm. and mixed structure, irregular polycystic
with vegetating solid formations, that
were
referred to ovaric adenocarcinoma”.
Her general condition was seriously
compromised. The treatment lasted approximately two months.
The progression
of the illness stopped and the mass progressively reduced in volume.
The
echotomograph report of November 1990 stated: “...Posterior to the
uterus occupying the Douglas, - an
expansive formation with diameter over 12 cm. and mixed structure part
liquid and part solid of probable annexial origin.”
Pag.
1 -
Pag.2
-
Pag. 3
-
Pag. 4
-
Pag. 5
-
Pag.7 -
Pag. 8 -
Pag. 9
HOME
|
