L'ultima Truffa del secolo passato....
"Tutti sono pronti a credere che la CIA menta, che il governo menta, che l'FBI menta, che la Casa Bianca menta. - dice il microbiologo americano Harvey Bialy - Ma che menta l'Istituto di Sanità no, non è possibile, la Sanità è sacra, tutto ciò che esce dagli Istituti Nazionali di Sanità è parola di Dio. Niente fa differenza, nemmeno la storia di come Gallo scoprì il virus, nemmeno il fatto che sia uno scienziato screditato e condannato per truffa. La strategia dell'establishment è sempre la stessa: ignorare. Meglio non rispondere, vuoi vedere che ci si accorge che c'è qualcosa di strano ?"
Una musica che non suona del tutto nuova, e che in questo caso arriva da un fronte ancora più controverso di quello dell'undici settembre: la medicina moderna - o meglio, l'industria farmaceutica che la condiziona ormai alla radice - stretta nella morsa letale del conflitto fra altruismo e egoismo, fra missione umana e interesse privato, in una spirale ormai inarrestabile che la porta a inventarsi malattie inesistenti pur di vendere più farmaci, mentre non riesce stranamente a trovare nessuna cura valida per le malattie che esistono davvero.
Quello che presentiamo è un lavoro di ricerca particolarmente illuminante .http://tinyurl.com/ygn7vq
visionare su arcoiris.tv il filmato:
http://www.arcoiris.tv/modules.php?name=Unique&id=5508

È possibile che la pandemia di AIDS sia stata causata da vaccini antipolio accidentalmente contaminati con un virus delle scimmie e utilizzati in Africa alla fine degli anni '50 ? Ebbene purtroppo SI !!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Edward Hooper has published 1,070 pages available at the subsidized price of 25 US $, "The River. A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS", Little, Brown; Boston, 1999.
The book argues, that it is very likely, but that further investigations are necessary to find out, if oral poliomyelitis immunizations 1957/1958/1959 of 270,000 persons in Congo, Rwanda, Burundi and possibly also in West-Africa unintentionally brought AIDS into the world.
This had been indicated 1985 by Phyllis Kanki and Myron Essex in an article in Science magazine. It was made public since 1987 by Eva Lee Snead. In 1989 Gerasmos Lecatsas and Jennifer Alexander mentioned it in a scientific paper. In 1991 it was extensively published by Louis Pascal in a scientific journal.

And in 1992 the magazine Rolling Stones and scientific papers discussed it. But it is only one of ten used medical (and of others) methods to introduce purposely HIV-1 and HIV-2 into dark-skinned persons mainly in Africa, which are named in my book "AIDS, Origin, Spread and Healing" published in 1994.
Hooper about that: "Geisler ...routinely interprets medical studies of infectious diseaseas as representing evidence that the doctors involved have previously introduced the pathogenic agents to their patients." (p. 929).

One scientific accident, as pretended by Hooper, might look possible. Ten accidents not.

Let us look on one of the nine other medical introductions. It is according to Hooper "the most notorious".
In "AIDS, Origin, Spread and Healing" chapter "7.3. Testing diseases in the West Nile district in Uganda" it is said, that "Only there (in the world) prior to the onset of the mass AIDS diseases were temporal and local clusters of (the AIDS indicating) Kaposis sarcoma; these were so marked that they proved an infectious cause - Only there (in the world) were temporal and local clusters of Burkitts lymphomas (also a potential AIDS disease) in children also proof of an infectious cause ". And world record incidences of three other diseases were there.

In 1968 the WHO undertook a study to test there the blood of children. When this stored blood from 1968 was examined eighteen years later for HIV antibodies, it contained zero HIV-antibodies (Levy 1986). In 1971/1972/1973 three times at yearly intervals the WHO has taken again blood samples from 46,000 children in three counties in West-Nile. The 46,000 samples are stored in Freiburg, Germany and Stockholm, Sweden.
In 1985 samples taken in 1972/1973 of 75 children were tested for HIV-antibodies. 50 showed clearly antibodies. The injections connected with the sampling by the WHO must have introduced HIV into the children. Because even if all the mothers of the children would have been infected, they could have transmitted HIV just to 13% of their children.
Hooper reports these facts in the following way: "Probably the most notorious study was one published in 1985 by Carl Saxinger and his boss, Robert Gallo, from the Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda. This retrospectively found that two-thirds of a small group of children bled between 1972 and 1973 in the Ugandan district of West Nile had been positive for HIV.
This cohort had a mean age of 6.4 years, and had been clinically healthy at the time of bleeding. But in Saxinger's hands, fifty-five of the seventy-five children tested positive for HIV antibodies on ELISA, and fifty of these positives were then confirmed by a 'newly developed ... enhanced sensitivity ... immunoblot,' which detected several typical HIV proteins.Unfortunately, it now appears certain that the sensitivity was so enhanced that it came up with false positive results for negative sera. ... it took other researchers to show that Saxinger and Gallo's 1972/1973 results from West Nile were highly improbable.
First, a group under Jay Levy in San Francisco published a 1986 paper that demonstrated that not a single serum from 199 children and adults bled in 1968 in West Nile was positive for HIV. Also in 1986, Wilson Carswell bled seventy-six apparently healthy adults who were resident in West Nile. Using a competitive ELISA technique, which is much more specific than the direct ELISA that had been used in Gallo's laboratory, he found just one serum to be HIV-positive. By contrast, he found that 15.4 percent of healthy adults from West Nile who were resident in Uganda's main city, Kampala, were HIV-positive, a percentage that was typical of healthy adults resident in the city. In other words, HIV was most unlikely to be endemic in West Nile, and citizens of West Nile were not innately prone to HIV infection although, like others, they became highly infected when they moved to a high-risk urban center."(pp. 106-7)
Comment: Carswell is a biological warfare specialist connected to the British government. In a region, where just in 3 of 8 counties 46,000 children became infected with HIV in 1971, it is easy to test in 1986 in areas, which have not been touched, 76 "healthy" adults. The selected findings of Carswell make West Nile a nearly HIV-free zone in Uganda.
Another example of concealing artificial infections: The people from Haiti, who left Haiti by boat and were kept in military camps in the USA ("boat-people") must have been infected not in Haiti but in the context with their arrival in the USA. ("AIDS, Origin, Spread and Healing", pp. 35-9).
In Miami, New York City and Montreal, where they were all treated in respectively one hospital, according to Hooper "the patients questioned claimed to have had no sexual contact with other Haitian immigrants since moving to North America, and admitted to no other risk factor. If correct, this would mean that they could only have been exposed to HIV infection in Haiti before emigrating in the mid seventies." (p.79). What about having been infected in other places ?
Other example: The samples of blood of two persons from Liberia, which were taken in 1971 after measles vaccinations, were proven in 1989 to contain HIV-1-antibodies. Hooper states, that they only "allegedly" were HIV-positiv.
His reasons for discrediting the chemical reactions: "The two alleged positive were an eighty-five-year-old woman and a sixty-year-old man, and there was no reactivity to HIV-2, the virus, that was more likely to be present in West-Africa..." (p.882).
Racistic attitude. Before dealing with deceitful medical statements of Hooper his attitude of racism has to be mentioned. Because this attitude could be the reason, why he tries over 1,070 pages to represent the biological war with AIDS as a possible singulair scientific accident.
Example: "The colonial interlude had, certainly, provided the country (Congo, a.) with schools and hospitals, railway lines and river steamers. But it had also been an era of benign paternalism: an era when 400-odd chimpanzees could be collected together and treated as, test-tubes containing human illnesses, an era when hundreds of thousands of Africans could be used to field-test different versions of an experimental vaccine - and nobody thought twice about it." (p. 723)
The European conquerers, who killed hundred thousands of inhabitants in Congo with sleeping sickness, tuberculosis, guns and who robbed diamonds, gold, cobalt, copper, uranium were benefactors. But their charitable rule was - in contrast - for Hooper "also ... an era of benign paternalism", when, first to mention, 400 chimpazees were deprived of all their rights, and second, some more Africans were used for the phase III test of a new medicine, and all responsible people thought only once about the safety.
Example: "...by 1930 a quarter of the population of French West Africa had been vaccinated against smallpox ... good work" (p. 681), even though nobody was dying as a consequence of small pox there at the time before.
Example:"AIDS, Origin, Spread and Healing" proves, that AIDS is biological warfare mainly against dark-skinned persons in Africa, Carribean, USA. Hooper interprets exclusively, that the targets are "homosexuals, junkies, and other perverts and reprobates" (p.11). Total omission of 80% of the named victims by him.
Example: When he talks of migrant labour in Africa, he surpasses in silence the most important one, that of Apartheid South Africa (pp. 677-81).
Example: "The Baganda love playing with words ... a nation of shopkeepers"(p.34), that is how he characterizes some million persons in Uganda.
Intended misinterpretations: Hooper repeats and repeats, that the infections in Congo and in West-Africa with HIV-1 and HIV-2 happened unintended. But even his stories bring facts which are not compatible with coincidence:

a) Of the 215,000 persons in Ruzizi valley (Congo, Burundi), which were fed with the polio vaccine, 202,000 had already, because of natural immunization, antibodies against the applied viruses. (p. 734) There is absolutely no "polio" justification for that "field-test".
b) The vaccine was used during respectively one day (p. 999), i.e. rests were destroyed in the evening.
c) During the first 31 month of the campaign exclusively "African" persons were fed with the vaccine (p. 733).
d) The vaccine was not applied in Katanga, (p. 728) where huge numbers of mine workers are used to extract the rich mineral resources.
e) "... absence of documentation ...no published data" (p. 846, n. 10.)
.."papers relevant... lost in a move" (p. 847, n. 15.) "complete absence of records ... at the Belgian foreign ministry archives." (p. 847, n. 16.), indicate concealing. f) "... the Wistar Institute and the Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control have failed to release samples of CHAT (the accused vaccine;
a.) for independent analysis..." (p. 847, n. 19.) The failure is maintained at least since 1991, the date of the publishing by Louis Pascal.

Medical nonsens: Let us now look at the deceitful medical statements and omissions.
Example: Hooper states that HIV is transmitted "sexually, perinatally, and parenterally" (p.11). But when oral polio vaccine - possibly accidentely contaminated by immunodeficiency lentiviruses of chimpanzees - was fed 1957, 1958, 1959 to 270,000 children in Congo, Rwanda and Burundi -because of lesions in the mouth "a few unfortunate individuals" (p. 848, n. 23.), he quotes "50"(p. 254), were infected with HIV - "and thence could have spread further between humans."

The statistical transmission rate of HIV by sexual intercourse is once in 730 contacts from man to woman and once in 2,150 from woman to man. Even the WHO figure of "HIV transmission, Exposure: Sexual intercourse, Efficiency 0.1% - 1%" (WHO. Global Programme on AIDS, Current and future dimensions of the HIV/AIDS Pandemic.
A capsule summary. September 1990.

WHO/GPA/SFI/90.2 Rev.1) (i.e. 550 in average; a.) is an exaggeration of the real possibility. Hooper conceals this low transmission rate. Let us calculate ourselves:
The 50 infected children became sexually active in about 1973. If they all were male
and each of them had every day two sexual contacts with an uninfected person, in 1984 there could have been 3,757 men and 6,507 women infected with HIV. But in 1984 in Africa alone already 2.5 million persons were infected with HIV (WHO. Office of information. 60% increase in estimated AIDS cases worldwide.
Press release WHO/53. 1 July 1994.).

Today (2000) there are about 25 million persons infected in Africa.
Example: Hooper phantasizes an "apparent" infection of an unknown soviet man by a "...blood transfusion given in Congo Brazzaville in 1981. ... The infected man's wife later gave birth to a perinatally infected baby, who - in one of the saddest and most extraordinary stories of the AIDS pandemic - was the source of a nosocomial outbreak of Group M-related AIDS at Elista Hospital in the south of the U.S.S.R. This epidemic resulted in the infection of 57 infants (probably due to the use of inadequately sterilized needles) and eight mothers - who may have contracted the virus from their infants, as a result of breast-feeding with cracked nipples." (p. 1030, n. 25.). To publish such totally unfounded absurd transmissions is whether a test of the stupidity of the readers or it is the effect of a mental illness.
Example: The bisexual violinist Herbert Heinrich from Koeln, Germany was possibly infected via a commonly used prostitute (p. 519) by Arvid Noe from Norway, who frequently between 1969 and 1973 came truck driving to Ruhrgebiet, about 70 miles from Köln, (p. 762, 773). Arvid Noe had himself aquired HIV in 1961 at the age of 15 at Douala, Cameroun. (p. 773) Then Hooper tells another speculation of Heinrichs infection: "Another theory ... more persuasive ... World Cup 1974 ... hundreds of enthusiastic supporters accompanied the team (from Zaire; a.) ...in Dortmund (fifty miles from Cologne) ... and in Gelsenkirchen". (p. 773) Two years later the violinist in Köln had AIDS. Normal are ten years after infection to develop the symptoms.

Other medical absurdities confirming Hoopers theory of accidents are for laypersons not always evident:
a) "typical early presentations of AIDS include ... chicken pox (Herpes zoster)." (p. 865, n. 21.) Chicken pox is not Herpes zoster and not a presentation of AIDS.
b) - not "disseminated candidiasis", but oral and oesophageal candidiasis - not "cryptococcosis", but cryptococcosis of lung, meninges and brain - not "toxoplasmosis", but toxoplasmosis of the brain (p. 59) are symptoms of AIDS according to the CDC definition.
c) "Cryptosporidiosis" was not "commonly found in ... humans." (p. 69) Till 1974 it was totally absent from humans, till 1979 there have been mentioned nine cases in the whole world.
d) "Opportunistic infections" are not "polyarthralgia, weight loss, oral candidiasis, ... severe diarrhea." (p.95).
e) There is no "classical African Kaposi sarcoma", in contrast to AIDS Kaposi sarcoma. (p. 881) Infact exactly the involvement of lymph glands in Kaposi patients was exclusively described in Africa and among AIDS patients.

Conclusion:
Hoopers book is the fourth publicistic front in the ongoing biological war with AIDS.
1984: According to Robert Gallo, HIV came from monkeys to "Africans" by natural ways and is distributed in Africa and elsewhere by sexual intercourse.
1986: According to Jakob Segal HIV was created in 1978 by US-American biological warfare specialist, was against their intention introduced into the world by some former prisoners and is distributed by sexual intercourse.
1989: According to Peter Duesberg HIV is a virus without any meaning, it is found in AIDS patients by coincidence. The AIDS diseases in Africa are caused by old, well known microbes, in USA/Europe by narcotics and stimulants.
1999: According to Edward Hooper HIV-1 with subgroups and HIV-2 were fabricated unintentionally by scientists in USA and France, introduced unintentionally into a few persons in Africa and are distributed by sexual intercourse. He is praised for that by BBC, New York Times, New York Daily News, Science, New Scientist, The Times, The Economist, The Guardian, Observer, Irish Times, Evening Standard, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Der Spiegel.
The truth: HIV-1, HIV-2, HIV-3, HIV-4, HIV-5 etc. with all subgroups were intentionally created since 1908, most of them out of the Virus of Infectious Anaemia of Horses. By about 97% they were and are distributed intentionally, namely by medical methods, by prepared insects, protozoa, and bacteria.

Koeln, 26. Dec 1999 - Dr. med. Wolff Geisler Heidestrasse 24 - D-51147 Koeln, Germany - 
Tel. 02203-64064 - Fax. 02203-67220 - e-mail: AIDSOrigin@aol.com

Bibliografia
 

"Questo sito WEB vi informa" Non siamo responsabili della correttezza e/o della solvibilità degli inserzionisti del ns. Network Webmaster  - Copyright © 1998,  Publisher Bamico ltd - All rights reserved  Tutti i diritti riservati - Vietata la copia anche parziale dei contenuti, se non viene citata la fonte