La vera causa dell'
AIDS: Tutto quello che non vi hanno
Nel 1984, l'allora Ministro della Sanità statunitense
Margaret Heckler ed il virologo Robert Gallo
dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità USA, annunciarono in una
conferenza stampa che l’AIDS era una nuova malattia
virale, trasmessa attraverso il sangue o i rapporti
sessuali. Fu detto che il virus che causava la malattia
era l'HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), e che
sarebbero occorsi circa due anni per individuare un
vaccino e sconfiggerlo. A distanza di ben 22 anni e miliardi di dollari spesi in
ricerca "fasulla", nessun vaccino è stato scoperto né ci
sono indizi che siamo in procinto di averlo e neppure è
stata individuata una cura efficace.
Il principale accusato da parte dei "dissidenti" è
proprio lui, Robert Gallo, il quale nel frattempo è
diventato multimiliardario grazie al test dell'HIV da
lui brevettato ai tempi dell'annuncio dell''84, ed anche
potentissimo, dato che gestisce ingenti fondi stanziati
per la ricerca sull'AIDS.
Anche se Gallo sosteneva di aver isolato lui il virus
HIV, l'Istituto Pasteur di Parigi lo denunciò sostenendo
che il virus era lo stesso già scoperto da un
ricercatore francese, Luc Montagner, che aveva inviato
alcuni campioni a Gallo. Fu in seguito deciso (da Reagan
e Chirac) che i due fossero considerati co-scopritori,
dividendosi i proventi della scoperta. Un'indagine
successiva sempre connessa alla vicenda ha addebitato a
Gallo altri comportamenti poco encomiabili, ma non ha
danneggiato più di tanto il "padre" di una teoria così
Ma cosa avevano scoperto questi due signori ?
Un gruppo di scienziati australiani, guidato dalla
Dott.ssa Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos dopo aver condotto
per anni esperimenti e studi di laboratorio è arrivato
alla conclusione che non si può provare che l’HIV
esista, lo si può solo supporre; ma quello che è
realmente impossibile affermare è che questo sia un
virus (o un retrovirus).
Stefan Lanka e Heinrich Kremer
sostengono anch’essi che l’esistenza del nesso fra HIV
ed aids è una pura supposizione torica. Mai dimostrata e non
dimostrabile il nesso.
La tesi di Lanka sulla supposta indiscutibile esistenza
dell’HIV è molto acuta ed intelligente. Egli sostiene
che il gran polverone “mediatico” suscitato dalla
diatriba tra Gallo e Montagner, protrattosi per anni con
scambi di accuse, scorrettezze e colpi bassi da
telenovela (troppi soldi in gioco), su chi fosse il
reale scopritore dell’HIV, è servito ad oscurare
l’attenzione sul fondamento della cosa più importante:
l’oggetto della contesa, cioè la scoperta stessa. Viene
mica in mente a nessuno di mettere in discussione cosa
abbiano scoperto due scienziati che litigano così
furiosamente per la paternità di una scoperta tanto
Quindi non vi è nessuna prova che esista il nesso fra il
cosiddetto virus HIV,
presunto portatore della sindrome da immunodeficienza
acquisita, e l'aids, ma e sopra tutto NON
esiste studio medico scientifico che lo DIMOSTRI !
e' un Virus
"Il paziente malato di
Aids NON muore a causa del virus
per alterazioni dell'assorbimento intestinale
quindi per ipoalimentazione (malNutrizione),
dovuta a una grave
micosi." (By Dott.
Gerhard Orth, Leuthkirch)
its the Bacteria stupid - PDF +
really caused by a virus ? - vedi anche:
L'altra storia dell'Aids +
documenti ufficiali, alcuni dei quali totalmente inediti
in Italia, che provano la truffa dell'Hiv-Aids.
Fatti a me ben noti, da giornalista investigativo e
dati per scontati gia' nel 1983....
Frutto di 3 anni di ricerca intesa e ostacolata di un
dottore italiano che, minacciato di morte, è emigrato all'estero.
Facciamo girare e diffondiamo il più possibile per
favore. Grazie a tutte/i.
L'Aids e' realmente
causato da un virus ?
HIV Virus inventato ?
Papadopoulos e l'aids
l'aids e' stato inventato in USA ?
I Postulati di Koch +
L'altra storia dell'Aids +
PDF di Luc Montagnier su AIDS ed HIV... +
PDF di Gallo e lo HIV...
Intervista a Kary
"A generarlo sono più fattori, di sicuro una vita molto disordinata mette a rischio
il sistema immunitario"
Ma la cosi detta "scienza"
ufficiale non crede al Nobel Mussil
MILANO. Kary Mullis, 53 anni, premio Nobel per la Chimica, da 10 anni conduce una
battaglia (quasi) solitaria sull'Aids.
A differenza della stragrande maggioranza degli
scienziati non è affatto convinto che la causa dell'Aids sia il retrovirus
1988, che "nessun esperimento scientifico lo ha mai provato". Dice che "le
cause potrebbero essere altre e più complesse". Dice (infine) "che l'Aids è
una epidemia meno diffusa della paura che ha generato". vedi
Kary Mullis (l'eretico) è venuto a
Milano per l'annuale incontro "Dieci Nobel per il futuro" e (come al solito) ha
scandalizzato la platea per le sue opinioni non ortodosse sulla ricerca scientifica in
generale e sull'Aids in particolare. In questi dieci anni ha diretto i controlli, per la
città di Los Angeles, su tutto il sangue donato alle strutture di sanità pubblica.
Poi si è occupato di Dna scoprendo la Polymerase Chain Reaction (reazione a catena della
polimerase) che consente di "fotocopiare" il Dna, quindi di produrne una gran
quantità anche da frazioni piccolissime. La scoperta gli ha fruttato il premio Nobel.
Ascoltarlo produce un vago senso di allarme. Anche adesso: poltrone in velluto di grande
albergo, mentre beve Campari, mangia noccioline, si stropiccia la faccia che ricorda
quella di Jack Nicholson, si gratta la testa e parla.
Quindi dottor Mullis, l'Aids è una invenzione ? "No, non dico affatto questo.
L'infezione e i morti sono reali, anche se assai più limitati di quanto si creda.
molte cose dette sull'Aids sono diventate vere a forza di ripeterle."
A cominciare dalla concatenazione Hiv-Aids alla quale non crede. "Qui non si tratta
di stabilire quello che io o lei o tutto il mondo suppone, desidera, crede. Non stiamo
parlando di religione."
Coma mai tra migliaia di scienziati lei è l'unico che... "L'unico proprio no... Ma
che vuol dire poi ? Anche Galileo era piuttosto solo, all'inizio..."
Perche' secondo lei la ricerca mondiale avrebbe accettato di perseverare
"L'inizio sono i miliardi di finanziamento pubblico e privato
per la ricerca... All'inizio degli Anni '80 il rubinetto stava andando a secco
Congresso Americano tirava la cinghia. E centinaia di laboratori, istituzioni governative
e private, giravano a rilento. Sto parlando dei massimi ambiti di ricerca degli Stati
Uniti, non di piccole o medie case farmaceutiche...
C'era bisogno di una epidemia e in un
certo senso l'epidemia fu trovata."
Sta scherzando ? "Non sto affatto scherzando, so di cosa parlo. Vede, se lei va a
Washington a dire che si occupa di una epidemia che infesta i corsi d'acqua africani, il
Congresso due soldi te li dà pure, solo che dopo un pò ti dice: chissenefrega. Ma se vai
da loro con una epidemia che infesta o infesterà le città di New York, Los Angeles, San
Francisco, insomma la vita urbana e poi quella rurale della sacra America, quelli
salteranno su una sedia e ti apriranno tutte le casseforti."
E' questo che è accaduto ? "E' accaduto che l'Aids faceva i primi morti tra gli
omosessuali e i tossicomani.
E' accaduto che non se ne capiva la causa... Che la paranoia
aumentava, che la ricerca procedeva sparsa verso tante ipotetiche cause. Ed è accaduto
che un giorno il grande Robert Gallo, togliendosi i suoi occhiali da Blues Brothers
davanti alle telecamere d'America disse: io so qual'è la causa, si chiama
Lo disse anche Luc Montagnier del Pasteur
di Parigi. "Più o meno negli stessi giorni di Bob Gallo. E i due si litigarono la
scoperta sino a che Reagan e Mitterrand, dopo un incontro a Vienna, dissero loro di
piantarla e di lavorare."
Cosa che fecero "Eccome. Sull'Aids sono stati investiti qualcosa come 30 miliardi di
dollari dal solo governo americano. Altrettanti dai privati, più quelli dei governi
europei e delle grandi multinazionali.
Una montagna di denaro."
Tutto indirizzato sull'Hiv. "Che è solo uno dei miliardi di retrovirus che stanno
tranquillamente nel nostro organismo.
Da allora in poi e per sempre si stabilì che se
c'era una certa quota di Hiv nel sangue, il paziente era positivo al test e quindi aveva
l'Aids. Poi magari moriva di polmonite, di tubercolosi, ma veniva classificato come Aids e
quindi vittima di Hiv. A Los Angeles ogni unità sanitaria che segnala un nuovo caso di
Aids riceve 2500 dollari di finanziamento federale."
Mi dice da dove arriva l'Aids, secondo lei, e da cosa è generato ? "La mia opinione
è che ci siano moltissime cause a generarlo. Riguardano l'insieme del sistema
immunitario, e lo stile di vita a cui viene sottoposto l'organismo.
C'è stata una parte
della generazione adulta negli Anni '60 e '70, americani bianchi e neri, non solo
omosessuali, ma di grande promiscuità sessuale, che per la prima volta ha praticato una
vita molto disordinata per periodi davvero lunghi."
In che senso disordinata ? "Significa bere molto alcol, dormire pochissimo, usare
droghe, eroina, coca, o le sintetiche, da quelle per rilassarsi, alle anfetamine per stare
svegli, mangiare male, ammalarsi spesso, usare continuamente antibiotici.
E avere, come
hanno rilevato le prime inchieste sulla popolazione colpita, da 100 a 300 rapporti
sessuali in un anno, con partner sempre differenti."
Sta parlando, più o meno, di giovani alternativi, dropout, gay... "Guardi che non
non c'è nessun giudizio moralistico, io sono lontanissimo da queste cose... Dico che mai
prima di allora moltissimi organismi si sono esposti a questo bombardamento quotidiano...
Il sistema immunitario funziona come un cammello nel deserto quando è sovraccarico:
regge, va avanti, poi crolla di colpo."
Ma non si disse che il virus era nato in Africa ? "Questa è un'altra leggenda... In
Africa non c'è un solo dato scientifico che lo provi. In Occidente, in presenza di Hiv
nel sangue, vengono definite Aids 29 differenti patologie. In Africa ne bastano tre:
perdita di peso, diarrea, e sfinimento. Se ricorda si disse che in Africa sarebbero
scomparse una o forse due intere generazioni. Non è accaduto. Si disse che il 70 per
cento delle prostitute senegalesi sarebbero morte nei successivi 5 anni: ne sono passati
10 e gran parte di loro sta benissimo."
Scusi, ma allora tutte le campagne sull'uso del preservativo... "E' una questione
interessante. Come è noto l'Aids non è progredito ai livelli esponenziali che ci avevano
pronosticato. La sua diffusione è molto diminuita.
Ci dicono che questo è accaduto
grazie alla prevenzione e all'uso diffuso del preservativo. Benissimo.
Ma allora come mai
tutte le infezioni veneree continuano a crescere ? La verità è che in America si usa il
preservativo più o meno come prima e probabilmente meno."
Se ha ragione, perchè sarebbe stato "inventato" l'Hiv ? "Perchè era un
modo semplice di risolvere un problema complesso. Perché metteva tutti d'accordo: il
fondamentalismo religioso e il puritanesimo.
La lobby della ricerca e la voracità dei
media. Era tutto spettacolare: molti soldi e molta gloria e molta autopunizione per tutti.
Se ricorda non si è parlato d'altro per anni. Come si fece per il
In che senso ? "Che anche quella guerra, come questa, fu fatta per tante ragioni,
comprese alcune molto stupide.
E su un'ipotesi probabilmente sbagliata. Come da 15 anni sull'Aids."
Pino Corrias - Tratto da "La Stampa", 07 dicembre 1998 - vedi Cure naturali
Pubblichiamo alcune dichiarazioni di eminenti personaggi della scienza
moderna, in materia di aids.
1. Luc Montagnier, dirige l’Istituto Pasteur di Parigi (produttore di
Ecco uno scambio epistolare molto molto illuminante tra Valendar Turner
(ricercatore e collaboratore della Eleni Eleopulos Papadopulos) e Robin
Weiss ricercatore inglese famoso per aver… “co-scoperto” il
dell’AIDS. Turner domanda a Weiss di spiegargli se, secondo lui,
Montagnier isolò effettivamente l’HIV.
Consigliamo fare molta attenzione a questa piccola discussione perché
riguarda il vero "noumeno" (quello che è conosciuto dalla
ragione pura) ovvero il “clou” di questa lunga storia. Ecco la prima
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999 11:04:48 +0800, Valendar
Caro Professor Weiss, Nel Suo commento sulla rivista Nature (New and
Views), "From Pan to pandemic", Lei ed il Suo collega Dr.
Wrangham affermate, l’origine del HIV-1, il retrovirus che è la
principale causa dell’ AIDS, è stato un puzzle fin dal tempo in cui è
stato scoperto da Barre-Sinoussi ed i suoi colleghi nel 1983".
In una intervista pubblicata nel 1998 che L. Montagnier ha rilasciato al
giornalista francese Djamel Tahi, a Montagnier fu chiesto perché lui ed i
suoi colleghi non pubblicarono le microfotografie elettroniche che
provano che la banda di 1,16 g/ml (il virus purificato) contenevano
particelle di HIV isolato.
Luc Montagnier rispose: “non fu
pubblicata tale prova poiché persino dopo sforzi titanici, alla densità
di 1,16g/ml non potevamo vedere alcuna particella con le caratteristiche
morfologiche tipiche dei retrovirus”.
Egli diede simili risposte a domande ripetute, incluso: “Ripeto,
noi non purificammo”, il che
significa semplicemente che: non isolammo il virus HIV
!. + Cosa
e' un Virus
Considerando questi dati si può correttamente sostenere che
"Barre-Sinoussi e i suoi colleghi nel 1983" scoprirono un
retrovirus ?. NO !
inoltre L. Montagnier continua dicendo in un’altra intervista: “l’aids
non porta inevitabilmente alla morte.
Per il mantenimento di una buona funzione immunitaria sono molto
importanti i fattori psicologici. Se indebolite psicologicamente qualcuno
dicendogli che sta per morire, sono le vostre parole a condannarlo”.
2. Dott. Kary Mullis: “La storia
dell’aids è legata ad una lunga serie di ricerche che sono state fatte
per provare che esisteva un virus che causava l’aids: Quei ricercatori
che non erano riusciti a dimostrare che un virus causava il cancro, hanno
affermato che il virus HIV causava l’aids”.
3. Walter Gilbert (premio Nobel per la chimica nel 1980, professore di
biologia molecolare ad Harvard):
“E’ assolutamente corretto
nell’affermare (sta parlando di Peter Duesberg), che nessuna ha
dimostrato che l’aids sia causato dal virus HIV; ed è assolutamente
giusto che i virus circolanti in laboratorio non possono essere la causa
dell’aids………non sarei assolutamente sorpreso se ci fossero altre
cause per l’aids e che persino lo HIV non fosse coinvolto”.
4. Charles Thomas (Professore di biochimica ad Harvard): “Nella pubblica opinione è ampiamente diffusa l’idea che il retrovirus
chiamato HIV , causa il gruppo di malattie chiamate aids.
adesso mettono in dubbio questa ipotesi. Proponiamo che una approfondita
riconsiderazione delle prove esistenti a favore e contro questa ipotesi,
sia condotta da un adeguato gruppo indipendente”.
5. Robert Toot – Bernstein (Scienziato molecolare, autore di Discovery
and Rethinking aids):
“Eravamo abituati a credere di
sapere che tutti siano ugualmente a rischio HIV o aids e che una epidemia
eterosessuale fosse inevitabile. Ma l’epidemiologia dell’aids deve
ancora fornire prove consistenti per tale ipotesi”.
6. Liaila O. Afrika (Autore di “Afrikan Holistic Health and
“Il virus dell’aids è una particella
della celllula umana: Non può mangiare, riprodursi, crescere, muoversi,
attaccare od essere attaccato, non è una pianta od animale e non è
Un virus non è attivo un mese ed inattivo (inerte) il successivo e
nemmeno dorme fra i due o cinque anni, prima di attaccare una persona”.
7. Peter Duesberg (Retrovirologo, membro dell’Accademia Nazionale delle
“L’HIV è solo un latente e
perfettamente innoffensivo retrovirus di cui molti, ma non tutti, i malati
di aids possono essere portatori. Dire che l’HIV è
la causa dell’aids significa mettere da parte tutto ciò che
sappiamo sui retrovirus. La teoria dell’HIV è inconsistente, assurda e
8. Dr. David Rasnick: “In qualità
di scienziato dopo 16 anni di studio sull’aids, mi sono convinto e reso
conto che questa malattia non
aveva molto a che fare con la scienza. L’aids è un fenomeno sociologico
costruito dalla paura.
Questo ha creato una sorte di Maccartismo che ha
fatto crollare tutte le regole di scienza per imporre un miscuglio di
credenze pseudo scientifiche ad un fragile pubblico”.
9. Joseph Sonnabend (Microbiologo): ”Non
esiste alcun agente eziologico specifico dell’aids….la malattia
insorge come risultato di processi cumulativi a seguito di un periodo di
esposizione a molteplici fattori ambientali”.
10. Serge Lang (professore della Yale University): “Non esiste nemmeno una singola definizione appropriata dell’aids sulla
quale discorsi o statistiche si possano verosimilmente basare….il CDC
chiama queste malattie aids sono quando anticorpi dell’HIV sono presenti
in maniera accertata o presunta: Se una persona risulta sieronegativa, a
queste malattie viene dato un altro nome”.
11. Albert Sabin (National Health Institute): “L’attuale
campagna di educazione e prevenzione si basa sull’asserto che ogni
sieropositivo può essere considerato agente di contagio, ma di questo non
vi è alcuna prova”.
12. Harry Rubin (Retrovirologo, menbro dell’Accademia Nazionale delle
“Non penso che sia stata trovata
la causa dell’aids: Penso che in una malattia così complessa vi siano,
verosimilmente cause multiple. Di fatto, chiamarla una malattia singola
quando presenta manifestazioni così diverse, mi sembra
13. Willner dr. Robert (Autore di Inganno mortale):
“La maggior parte delle morti per
aids controllate dai medici sono state provocate del tutto od in parte dal
farmaco letale AZT. In molti casi il farmaco è stato dato ad individui
perfettamente sani e normali che erano terrorizzati…. dopo
l’inaffidabile test di sieropositività”.
14. Dr.Richard Beltz (Inventore dell’AZT - azidotimina): "L’AZT
non aveva prospettive per due ragioni: i miei studi hanno mostrato che era cancerogeno in ogni dosaggio e che era
troppo tossico anche per usi di breve periodo".
15. John Lauritsen (Autore de La guerra dell’AIDS):"Si
proclama che l’AZT salva la vita. E ancora adesso la maggior parte del
credito che gli si dà è basato sugli esperimenti della III fase che
erano pieni di crepe e completamente senza valore".
16. Baggaley dr. Rachel (British Health Advisor):
" Nessuno in Zambia muore mai di AIDS; dicono che è per malaria,
febbre o tubercolosi".
17. Neville Hodgkinson (Collaboratore del London Sunday
nuovo autorevole studio ha messo in luce l’energica evidenza che il test
dell’aids non ha valore scientifico, confondendo milioni di persone nel
fargli credere che sono sieropositive quando non è vero che sono colpite
dal virus. Si è accresciuta la preoccupazione che l’esplosione
dell’aids in Africa sia stata selvaggiamente esagerata”.
18. Kary Mullis (Inventore del test PCR, Premio Nobel per la
Chimica nel 1993): “Hanno considerato il gran numero di persone sieropositive (in Africa)
prima di accorgersi che gli anticorpi della malaria, che in Africa hanno
tutti, si mostrano nei test come positivi all’HIV”.
19. PhillipE. Johnson (Giornalista) “Ai
giornalisti che si occupano di storie di
aids, un gruppo di eminenti scienziati ha detto che non vi è alcun
dubbio che il mondo è minacciato della catastrofica piaga dell’aids e
mettere in discussione questo fatto è tanto razionale quanto dire che la
Terra è piatta”.
20. John Lauritsen (Autore di The Great AIDS Hoax): “...L’aids
non è ne nuovo né unico, ma è stato inventato come parola (ombrello)
per coprire un complesso di malattie, alcune delle quali erano già state
descritte dalla medicina nel 1539”.
21. GlaxoWellcome (Casa farmaceutica che produce il Retrovir – AZT): “ATTENZIONE il Retrovir (zidovudina) può causare tossicità ematica
(avvelenamento del sangue, ndr) compreso la granulocipetomia e gravi
anemie, particolarmente in pazienti con malattie ha HIV in fase avanzata.
La piena innocuità e il profilo di efficienza del Retrovir, non è stata
ben definita, particolarmente nei confronti di individui affetti da HIV
con minor avanzamento della malattia”.
22. Elinor Burkett, (Autrice di The Greatest Show on Earth): parlando
dell’industria dell’aids: “... un
insieme di certi dottori, politici, ricercatori negli enti governativi,
assicuratori, leader di comunita gay, funzionari del CDC, burocrati delle
assicurazioni sanitarie e funerarie, media... tutti quelli che possono
aver intascato o essere stati puniti o confusi od aver soggiaciuto
all’avidità e all’egoismo”.
23. Tom Bethell (ricercatore alla Hoover Institution): “Il
fatto è, adesso ne sono convinto, che l’aids non è affatto una
malattia: è un programma di governo”.
24. Geshekter dr. Charles (professore di storia alla California
University, Chico): “Un rapporto del 1994 nel Journal of Infection Diseases (rivista delle
malattie infettive) ha concluso che il test HIV è stato inutile in
Africa, ove i germi della tubercolosi, malaria, lebbra sono così diffusi
che hanno contribuito a dare oltre il 70% di falsi sieropositivi.... in
persone i cui sistemi immunitari sono compromessi per altre ragioni che
25. Rep. Gil Gutknecht (U.S. House of Representatives, membro del
Comitato sulla Scienza): “Considerando
che esiste una limitata prova scientifica dell’esatto legame tra HIV e
AIDS, è forse etico prescrivere AZT, un distruttore del DNA utilizzato 30
anni fa come chemioterapico per il cancro, a 150 mila Americani, tra i
quali donne incinte e neonati, come farmaco anti HIV ?”
26. Elliot Fox (Giornalista, fondatore dell’Associazione per il
riesame dell’AIDS): “AIDS, la Waterloo del complesso delle industrie farmaceutiche, è stato
descritto come derivante da un virus, a dispetto della più che provata
evidenza del contrario, scoperto da test su anticorpi che si sono
dimostrati grossolanamente inaccurati e curato da farmaci incredibilmente
tossici che sono stati definitivamente definiti come responsabili della
27. Jon Rappaport (Commentatore, giornalista, autore di AIDS,
Inc.): “Un sacco di gente è
cosciente che l’HIV è una burla e che l’AZT uccide la gente.... Molta
gente si sta accorgendo che questo non è il comportamento di un male
28. Giornale “Bio
Tecnology”: “Il solo modo per distinguere le reazioni di produzione di anticorpi
dovuti al virus HIV dalle reazioni di anticorpi prodotte per cause
diverse, sarebbe di isolare il virus HIV. Purtroppo il virus NON è stato
I test che controllano gli anticorpi non sono specifici per
un’infezione da virus HIV”
1) Montagnier (Istituto
Pasteur - Francia, lo "scopritore" del virus HIV) dice
che quello che ha trovato e poi spedito in parte a
Gallo (USA, che dice di essere invece lui il vero scopritore
dello HIV) non può essere un retrovirus, ma il
"treno dell'aids" ed i medici indottrinati dalla sanita'
mondiale, non prendono in considerazione questi dati.
2) Mullis inventa una tecnica con la quale la massa
conta i virus; lo stesso Mullis dice che tale
procedimento è errato, ma la massa dei medici
indottrinati non lo ascolta.
3) Tante teorie alternative si formano sull'argomento,
ma la massa dei medici indottrinati non le prende
neanche in considerazione
4) Un farmaco palesemente tossico
AZT (letale) è stato
somministrato per anni e la massa dei medici
indottrinati nega che tale farmaco fosse tossico,
contraddicendo chi quel farmaco ha inventato
un articolo (in inglese) pubblicato sulla stampa mondiale negli anni 1980
In an extensive article in the Summer-Autumn 1990 issue of "Top
Secret", Prof J. Segal and Dr. L. Segal outline their theory that
AIDS is a man-made disease, originating at Pentagon bacteriological
warfare labs at Fort Detrick, Maryland.
Secret is the international edition of the German magazine Geheim and is
considered by many to be a sister publication to the American Covert
Action Information Bulletin (CAIB). In fact, Top Secret carries the Naming
Names column, which CAIB is prevented from doing by the American
government, and which names CIA agents in different locations in the
The article, named "AIDS: US-Made Monster" and subtitled
"AIDS - its Nature and its Origins," is lengthy, has a lot of
professional terminology and is dotted with footnotes.
The following is my humble attempt to encapsulate its highlights. It is
recommended that all interested read the original, which is available at
some bookstores, or can be ordered for $3.50 from:
Top Secret/Geheim Magazine P.O.Box 270324 5000 Koln 1 Germany
fatal weakening of the immune system which has given AIDS its name (Acquired Immuno-Deficiency
Syndrome)," write the Segals, "has
been traced back to a destruction or a functional failure of the T4
lymphocytes, also called 'helper cells`, which play a regulatory role in
the production of antibodies in the immune system." In the course of
the illness, the number of functional T4- cells is reduced greatly so that
new anti-bodies cannot be produced and the defenseless patient remains
exposed to a range of infections that under other circumstances would have
been harmless. Most AIDS patients die from opportunistic infections rather
than from the AIDS virus itself. The initial infection is characterized by
diarrhea, erysipelas and intermittent fever.
An apparent recovery follows
after 2-3 weeks, and in many cases the patient remains without symptoms
and functions normally for years. Occasionally a swelling of the lymph
glands, which does not affect the patient's well-being, can be
After several years, the pre-AIDS stage, known as ARC (Aids- Related
Complex) sets in. This stage includes disorders in the digestive
kidneys and lungs. In most cases it develops into full-blown AIDS in about
a year, at which point opportunistic illnesses occur. Parallel to this
syndrome, disorders in various organ systems occur, the most severe in the
brain, the symptoms of which range from motoric disorders to severe
dementia and death.
This set of symptoms, say the Segals, is identical in every detail with
the Visna sickness which occurs in sheep, mainly in Iceland. (Visna means
tiredness in Icelandic). However, the visna virus is not pathogenic for
The Segals note that despite the fact that AIDS is transmitted only
through sexual intercourse, blood transfusions and non- sterile hypodermic
needles, the infection has spread dramatically. During the first few years
after its discovery, the number of AIDS patients doubled every six months,
and is still doubling every 12 months now though numerous measures have
been taken against it.
Based on these figures, it is estimated that in the US, which had 120,000
cases of AIDS at the end of 1988, 900,000 people will have AIDS or will
have died of it by the end of 1991. It is also estimated that the number
of people infected is at least ten times the number of those suffering
from an acute case of AIDS.
That in the year 1995 there will be between 10-14 million cases of AIDS
and an additional 100 million people infected, 80 percent of them in the
US, while a possible vaccination will not be available before 1995 by the
most optimistic estimates. Even when such vaccination becomes available,
it will not help those already infected.
These and following figures have
been reached at by several different mainstream sources, such as the US
Surgeon General and the Chief of the medical services of the US Army.
Say the Segals: "AIDS does not merely bring certain dangers with it;
it is clearly a programmed catastrophe for the human race, whose magnitude
is comparable only with that of a nuclear war." They later explain
what they mean by "programmed," showing that the virus was
produced by humans, namely Dr. Robert Gallo of the Bethesda Cancer
Research Center in Maryland.
When proceeding to prove their claims, the Segals are careful to note that: "We have given preference to the
investigative results of highly renowned laboratories, whose objective
contents cannot be doubted. We must emphasize, in this connection, that we
do not know of any findings that have been published in professional
journals that contradict our hypotheses."
first KNOWN cases of AIDS occurred in New York in 1979. The first
DESCRIBED cases were in California in 1979.
The virus was isolated in
Paris in May 1983, taken from a French homosexual who had returned home
ill from a trip to the East Coast of the US. One year later, Robert Gallo
and his co-workers at the Bethesda Cancer Research Center published their
discovery of the same virus, which is cytotoxic, i.e poisonous to cells.
Shortly after publishing his discovery,
Gallo stated to newspapers that the virus had developed by a natural
process from the Human Adult Leukemia virus, HTLV-1, which he had
previously discovered. However, this claim was not published in
professional publications, and soon after, Alizon and Montagnier, two
researchers of the Pasteur Institute in Paris published charts of HTLV-1
and HIV, showing that the viruses had basically different structures. They
also declared categorically that they knew of no natural process by which
one of these two forms could have evolved into the other.
According to the professional "science" magazine, the fall 1984
annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science
(AAAS), was almost entirely devoted to the question of: to what extent new
pathogenic agents could be produced via human manipulation of genes.
According to the Segals, AIDS
was practically the sole topic of discussion.
THE AIDS VIRUS
The Segals discuss the findings of Gonda et al, who compared the HIV,
visna and other closely-related viruses and found that the visna virus is
the most similar to HIV. The two were, in fact, 60% identical in 1986.
According to findings of the Hahn group, the mutation rate of the HIV
virus was about a million times higher than that of similar viruses, and
that on the average a 10% alteration took place every two years. That
would mean that in 1984, the difference between HIV and visna would have
been only 30%, in 1982- 20%, 10% in 1980 and zero in 1978.
"This means," say the Segals, "that at this time visna viruses changed
into HIV, receiving at the same time the ability to become parasites in
human T4-cells and the high genetic instability that is not known in other
This is also consistent with the fact that the first cases
of AIDS appeared about one year later, in the spring of 1979."
"In his comparison of the genomes of visna and HIV," add the
Segals, "Coffin hit upon a remarkable feature.
The env (envelope) area of the HIV genome, which encodes the envelope
proteins which help the virus to attach itself to the host cell, is about
300 nucleotides longer than the same area in visna.
This behavior suggests that an additional piece has been inserted into the
genomes of the visna virus, a piece that alters the envelope proteins and
enables them to bind themselves to the T4-receptors.
BUT THIS SECTION BEHAVES LIKE A BIOLOGICALLY ALIEN BODY, which does
not match the rest of the system biochemically. (emphasis mine)
The above mentioned work by Gonda et al shows that the HIV virus has a
section of about 300 nucleotides, which does not exist in the visna virus.
That length corresponds with what Coffin described. That section is
particularly unstable, which indicates that it is an alien object.
According to the Segals, it "originates in an HTLV-1 genome, (discovered by
Gallo-ED) for the likelihood of an accidental occurrence in
HIV of a genome sequence 60% identical with a section of the HTLV-1 that
is 300 nucleotides in length is zero." Since the visna virus is
incapable of attaching itself to human T4 receptors, it must have been the
transfer of the HTLV-1 genome section which gave visna the capability to
do so. In other words, the addition of HTLV-1 to visna made the HIV virus.
In addition, the high mutation rate of the HIV genome has been explained
by another scientific team, Chandra et al, by the fact that it is "a
combination of two genome parts which are alien to each other BY
ARTIFICIAL MEANS rather than by a natural process of evolution, because
this process would have immediately eliminated, through natural selection,
systems that are so replete with disorders."
"These are the facts of the case," say the Segals.
"HIV is essentially a visna virus which carries an additional protein
monomer of HTLV-1 that has an epitope capable of bonding with T4 receptors. Neither Alizon and Montagnier nor any other biologist know of
any natural mechanism that would make it possible
for the epitope to be transferred from HTLV-1 to the visna virus. For this
reason we can come to only one conclusion: that this gene combination
arose by artificial means, through gene manipulation."
CONSTRUCTION OF HIV
construction of a recombinant virus by means of gene manipulation is
extraordinarily expensive, and it requires a large number of highly
qualified personnel, complicated equipment and expensive high security
Moreover, the product would have no commercial value. Who,
the Segals, "would have provided the resources for a type of research
that was aimed solely at the production of a new disease that would be
deadly to human beings?"
The English sociologist Allistair Hay (as well as Paxman et al in
"A Higher Form of Killing"-ED), published a document whose
authenticity has been confirmed by the US Congress, showing that a
representative of the Pentagon requested in 1969 additional
funding for biological warfare research. The intention was to
create, within the next ten years, a new virus that would not be
susceptible to the immune system, so that the afflicted patient would not
be able to develop any defense against it.
Ten years later, in the spring
of 1979, the first cases of AIDS appeared in New York.
"Thus began a phase of frantic experimentation," say the Segals.
One group was working on trying to cause animal pathogens to adapt
themselves to life in human beings.
This was done under the cover of searching for a cure for cancer. The race
was won by Gallo, who described his findings in 1975. A year later, Gallo
described gene manipulations he was conducting. In 1980 he published his
discovery of HTLV.
In the fall of 1977, a P4 (highest security category of laboratory, in
which human pathogens are subjected to genetic manipulations)
laboratory was officially opened in building 550 of Fort
Detrick, MD, the Pentagon's main biological warfare research
center. "In an article in 'Der Spiegel`, Prof. Mollings point out
that this type of gene manipulation was still extremely difficult in 1977.
One would have had to have a genius as great as Robert Gallo for this
purpose, note the Segals."
Lo and behold. In a supposed compliance with the international
accord banning the research, production and storage of biological
weapons, part of Fort Detrick was "demilitarized" and the virus
section renamed the "Frederick Cancer Research Facility". It was
put under the direction of the Cancer Research Institute in
neighboring Bethesda, whose director was no other than Robert
Gallo. This happened in 1975, the year Gallo discovered HTLV.
how the virus escaped, the Segals note that in the US, biological agents
are traditionally tested on prisoners who are incarcerated for long
periods, and who are promised freedom if they survive the
test. However, the initial HIV infection symptoms are mild and
followed by a seemingly healthy patient.
"Those who conducted the research must have concluded that the new
virus was...not so virulent that it could be considered for military
use, and the test patients, who had seemingly recovered, were given
Most of the patients were professional criminals and
New York City, which is relatively close, offered them a suitable milieu.
Moreover, the patients were exclusively men, many of them having a history
of homosexuality and drug abuse, as is often the case in American prisons.
It is understandable why AIDS broke out precisely in 1979, precisely among
men and among drug users, and precisely in New York City," assert the
Segals. They go on to explain that whereas in cases of infection by means
of sexual contact, incubation periods are two years and more, while
in cases of massive infection via blood transfusions, as must have
been the case with prisoners, incubation periods are shorter than a year.
"Thus, if the new virus was ready at the beginning of 1978 and if the
experiments began without too much delay, then the first cases
of full- blown AIDS in 1979 were exactly the result that could
have been expected."
In the next three lengthy chapters, the Segals examine other
theories, "legends" as they call them, of the origins of AIDS.
Dissecting each claim, they show that they have no scientific standing,
providing also the findings of other scientists. They also
bring up the arguments of scientists and popular writers who have been at
the task of discounting them as "conspiracy theorists" and show
these writers' shortcomings. Interested readers will have to read the
original article to follow those debates. I will only quote two more
"We often heard the argument that experiments with human volunteers
are part of a barbaric past, and that they would be impossible
in the US today... We wish to present one single document
whose authenticity is beyond doubt.
An investigative commission of the US House of Representatives
presented in October 1986 a final report concerning the Manhattan Project.
According to this document, between 1945 and 1975 at least 695 American citizens were exposed to dangerous doses of radioactivity. Some
of them were prisoners who had volunteered, but they also
included residents of old-age homes, inmates of insane asylums,
handicapped people in nursing homes, and even normal patients
in public hospitals; most of them were subjected to these experiments
without their permission. Thus the 'barbaric past` is not really a
thing of the past."
"It is remarkable that most of these experiments were carried out in
university institutes and federal hospitals, all of which are named in the
Nonetheless, these facts remained secret until 1984, and even then a
Congressional committee that was equipped with all the necessary
authorization needed two years in order to bring these facts to life. We
are often asked how the work on the AIDS virus could have been kept
secret. Now, experiments performed on a few dozen prisoners in a
laboratory that is subject to military security can be far more easily
kept secret than could be the Manhattan Project.”
Black Crawling Systems @ V0iD Information Archives ( 6 1 7 ) 4 8 2
- 6 3 5 6
The following articles are extracted from New Dawn magazine, Volume No. 1
& 2. (C) Copyright April 1992.
New Dawn, GPO Box 3126FF, Melbourne,
Shocking Revelations on AIDS Research by Our North American Correspondent
Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad, national spokesman for Minister Louis Farrakhan
and the Nation of Islam, dropped a bombshell on the nation's capital at a
mass rally held at All Souls Unitarian Church on September 8. Although the
event had been planned for some time to celebrate the 10th anniversary of
the Washington, D.C. ministry of Dr. Muhammad, he turned the event into a
report on his recent fact-finding mission to the African nation of Kenya.
Dr. Muhammad startled the standing-room-only audience when he announced
that a research team working out of the Kenyan Medical Research Institute,
led by the Harvard-trained immunologist Dr. David Koech, had made dramatic
advances in the treatment of AIDS. Dr. Muhammad also charged that the U.S.
government was leading a major effort by the international medical
establishment to suppress this groundbreaking research.
Among those who packed the church to hear Dr. Muhammad speak on the theme
"Can We Survive Genocide," were clergy from several
denominations along the East Coast, civil rights leaders, community
activists, leaders of the Nation of Islam, elected officials and political
leaders from Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, and
hundreds of ordinary citizens.
The introduction of Washington's former Mayor Marion Barry - the man on
whom the Bush administration spent millions to remove him from office -
brought the house to its feet in an extended ovation.
A Policy of Genocide
In his remarks, Dr. Muhammad quoted extensively from a 1985 article
authored by Lyndon LaRouche, "The Looming Extinction of the 'White
Race'". In that piece, LaRouche documents that the imperial policies
intrinsic to oligarchism have set into motion the self-destruction of the
population levels and economies of those "white" nations that
have complicitly tolerated oligarchical policies - most specifically the
United States and Great Britain.
LaRouche states that since what the oligarchs call the "Great White
Race" is dying out at an accelerating rate, and threatening the
supremacy of the Anglo-American financial establishment, we witness a
fanatically Malthusian commitment to a policy of genocide directed against
people of colour; a genocide consciously implemented through the
conditionalities policies of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
"That," Dr. Muhammad charged, "is one of the reasons they've got him locked up; because
he's got the guts to tell the truth”.
Dr. Muhammad went on to present extensive evidence that the policy of
deliberate genocide is fully operational.
He described the CIA's support
for the cause of population control during George Bush's tenure as
Director of Central Intelligence, and reported the contents of National
Security Memorandum 200, written during the Ford administration, which
advised that the preservation of U.S. political and commercial interests
"will require that the President and Secretary of State treat the
subject of population growth control in the third world as a matter of
To the amazement of the audience, Muhammad
identified the authors of the internal memo as Henry Kissinger and Gen.
Brent Scowcroft, now Bush's national security adviser.
(See The New Dawn Vol.1 No.1, May, 1991)
Dr. Muhammad used the case of Brazil, which has the second largest black
population in the world, to prove that the memorandum was being
implemented. "Today in Brazil, 40% of the women of childbearing age
have been surgically sterilized with funds provided by the USAID," he
said, "and 90% of those sterilized women are black."
He insisted that this genocide was the real agenda of Bush's New World
Order; that it not only motivated the invasion of Panama and the
kidnapping of Gen. Manuel Noriega, but also the continuing murder of the
nation of Iraq. He told the audience that these were just the opening
battles in the war of the advanced sector nations of the North against the
developing nations of the South. Dr. Muhammad denounced George Bush as a
wicked man who cherished his membership in the satanic secret society
Skull and Bones. He reminded the audience that the "skull and
bones" was also the emblem on the flag flown by the slave traders who
raided Africa, as well as of the latter day pirates.
AIDS and 'population control'
Given the Anglo-American establishment's commitment to mass murder, the
effort to suppress the promising research of Dr. Koech and his colleagues
should come as no surprise to anyone, the Nation of Islam leader said.
In fact, he contended, there is substantial evidence to indicate that AIDS
was developed as a race-specific population control measure. Dr. Muhammad
ridiculed the theory that AIDS originated when the virus made a species
jump from the African green monkey to the African population. "We
lived with the green monkey for thousands of years and never had any
The green monkey isn't our enemy. The IMF is."
Dr. Muhammad, who is a trained surgeon, said he traveled to Kenya to see
for himself what the alpha interferon derivative, which goes under the
trade name Kemron, was really all about. Dr. Muhammad reported that he
interviewed the research team in their laboratory, was permitted to review
their data, and to examine AIDS patients currently undergoing treatment
with Kemron and with a new, more advanced form of Kemron, the drug Immunex, which contains a greater number of alpha interferon components
than the original drug.
Dr. Muhammad stressed that although the new drug was only a treatment and
not a cure for the deadly HIV virus, he was tremendously hopeful and
encouraged by the dramatic improvement in the condition of those
Dr. Muhammad introduced Dr. Barbara Justice, a well-known New York
City-based cancer surgeon who has sent 54 AIDS patients to Kenya for
treatment over the past year. Dr. Justice reported that 97% of her
patients showed marked improvement within weeks of beginning treatment,
and that most were able to regain some degree of normalcy in their ability
It has been almost impossible for anyone outside of Kenya administering
Kemron on an experimental basis in the to assess the work of the Kenyan
team, which has been treatment of AIDS since 1989, since it has been
systematically blacked out of the scientific literature. Dr. Koech was to
present his data, first at the International AIDS Conference in the United
States in 1987, and then again at the 1991 AIDS Conference in Italy.
On both occasions, his invitation was inexplicably withdrawn.
Last year, Dr. Koech decided to take his data directly to the U.S. medical
community, and an extensive U.S. lecture tour was planned. That tour was
abruptly cancelled when the State Department refused to issue Dr. Koech
the necessary permission to enter the United States.
This is certainly not the first time that important AIDS research has been
suppressed. Quite the contrary, it is part of a continuing criminal
pattern of lies and cover-up. The importance of a rapid evaluation of Dr.
Koech's work with Kemron and Immunex is obvious. Currently, the only
treatment available to AIDS victims is the drug AZT; however, AZT therapy
is prohibitively expensive and carries with it extremely destructive side
effects, especially with prolonged use. Additionally, a recent study
conducted by the U.S. Army showed that, for unexplained reasons, AZT
therapy is not only largely ineffective in the treatment of blacks, but
that, in fact, AZT seems to aggravate symptoms in an alarming number of
Kenya's President Daniel Arap Moi clearly finds the Koech
to be convincing. He recently announced that his government was building a
factory to allow the mass production of alpha interferon.**
AIDS - Man-Made Holocaust
The fact that AIDS is a man-made virus created in U.S. laboratories has
been covered up
By JASON JEFFREY
"America should withdraw from the Mediterranean, Europe and all
foreign bases and it should save that money to create jobs for 12 million
unemployed Americans, and contribute towards the elimination of the
diseases it manufactured like AIDS which was produced by the CIA at its
laboratories and tested on American prisoners who took the virus with them
to the outside world when released from prison and then it spread
throughout the world." - Muammar Al-Qadhafi speaking at the
International Conference for Peace in the Mediterranean, 4-6 May, 1990.
On July 4, 1984, the Indian daily Patriot published a horrifying report
that the disease AIDS was believed to
have originated from a virus created in the laboratories at
the U.S. germ warfare research institute at Fort
Detrick, Maryland. The editor explained that the information had come from
a well-known American scientist
and anthropologist who expressed the fear that India might face a danger
from the disease in the near future.
The American had to remain anonymous. He was obviously in danger for
having disclosed so deadly a secret.
At that time, when the full horror of the incurable disease was not known
Patriot reported that the World Health Organisation believed AIDS posed
the gravest threat to the entire population of the world. More on the
World Health Organisation later.
The British Sunday Express, 26
October, 1986, with banner headlines, and an "exclusive"
announced "AIDS made in lab. shock." The front-page story said
that the virus was created during laboratory experiments which "went
It added that a massive cover-up had kept the
secret from the world. The Sunday Express quoted a British expert, Dr.
John Seale, who first reported his conclusion that the virus was man-made
last August, 1986, in the Royal Society of Medicine Journal.
He said that his report was met with a "deadly silence" from the
medical profession, and that made him very suspicious.
The editor of the
Journal agreed, according to Dr. Seale, that "it sounded like a
conspiracy of silence."
The second expert quoted by the Sunday Express, was Prof. Jacob Segal,
retired Director of the Institute of Biology in Berlin.
It said, "our
investigators have revealed that two U.S. Embassy officials made a
two-hour visit to Prof. Segal at his home two weeks ago questioning him
about what he knows, what he thinks, where he got his information, and
what he intends doing with his report." The Professor told the
reporters, "one said he was a historian, and the other said he was a
But I am positive they were from the CIA, and that they
were deeply concerned that the cover-up over the origin of AIDS was going
to be exposed."
I told them I had known that in the mid-70s experiments were being carried
out at Fort Detrick, where the U.S. Army Medical Research Command has its
headquarters, on volunteer long-term prisoners who were promised their
freedom after the tests. Almost certainly the scientists were unaware of
the extent of their terrible creation - the AIDS virus.
third expert quoted in the Sunday Express was Dr. Robert Strecker, an
internist and gastroentarologist from Glendale, California, who stated
"it must have been genetically engineered." Strecker believes,
after years of exhaustive research, that the AIDS virus is indeed man-made. Strecker has alleged that AIDS was engineered at the request of
the World Health Organisation and other scientific groups who, according
to Strecker, injected the disease during preventative vaccines. WHO, he
says, along with the International Agency for Research on Cancer and The
National Institute on Health, requested the production of a virus that
would attack the immune system's T-cells. AIDS, he says, is a hybrid of
two animal viruses – bovine leukemia (found in cattle) and a sheep brain
virus called visna. This new virus was given as vaccinations in Haiti,
Brazil, Africa and the Caribbean by WHO in a 13-year campaign against
smallpox in Third World nations, reports indicate. Strecker, in his
97-minute videotape, "The Strecker Memorandum," cites specific
documentation supporting theories that AIDS is a result of that direct
For example, from Volume 47 of Bulletin of the World Health
Organisation (1972), page 259:
"The effects of virus infection
of different cell types (e.g., Macrophages, T and B lymphocytes) should be
studied in greater detail with morphological changes perhaps serving as an
indication of functional alteration..." "The possibility should
also be looked into that the immune response to the virus may itself be
impaired if theinfecting virus damages more or less selectively the cells
responding to the viral antigens..."
In fact, a May 11, 1987 frontpage article in the London Times, headlined
"Smallpox Vaccine Triggered AIDS Virus," said WHO was
investigating new evidence suggesting that "immunization from the
smallpox vaccine Vaccinia awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno
defense virus infection (HIV).
" Vaccinia was the actual vaccine given as smallpox deterrents during
the WHO project. Were the AIDS infections intentional, accidental or
According to Strecker in his "Memorandum," a key part of the
actual study "was to be the time relationship between infection and
antigen administration," which suggests WHO officials - and other
agencies who were directly dependent on the United States government for
research grants – had to have known.
The denials were not long in coming. But the British Sunday Telegraph
exposed itself. It said the story (the Sunday Express article) was
invented by the Russians "to smear the Americans," and recalled
that it had appeared in the Soviet journal, Literary Gazette. It said this
paper based its report on the Patriot - and that the Patriot report did
not exist ! Professor Segal describes as "ludicrous and
scientifically incredible" the theory that the virus came from
African green monkeys. One thing is certain: the controversy surrounding
the AIDS virus will not die.
Weapon Against Black People
Zear Miles, a Black industrial engineer, who has studied the AIDS virus and its
origins for about six years has stated that he has proof from various
documentation and letters from other AIDS researchers to prove that the
virus was made in an American military lab as a means to suppress Blacks.
In his document entitled "Rape Africa", Miles researched the
origin of the AIDS virus from 1952, when the federal government had enough
blood types and characteristics of every nationality in the world up to
the King Alfred plan which called for the extinction of Blacks in national
Miles learned that through National Security
Council Memorandum 46, dated 1978, which called for a possible way to
gauge and control the impact of the growing Black movement, the government
was researching possible ways to suppress Black hostility toward the
authorities. Later called the King Alfred plan, the scheme called for the
extinction of Blacks by the year 2000 with an AIDS-like virus. Miles
said he also gauged the increasing number of AIDS cases in which the
number of Black contractors have gone up significantly compared with
Whites, citing that the AIDS virus attacked a Black person's immune system
and destroyed it in six weeks as opposed to a White person's time of six
is the evidence available to the layman. First, the initial cases were
reported in New York and there is no dispute that Fort Detrick was working
on immunological defence against infection. The British Guardian reported
on October 27, 1986, that in 1969 evidence was given to a Washington
Appropriation Committee that "within the next five or ten years it
would probably be possible to make a new infective micro-organism which
would differ from any known disease causing organism.
Most important, that
it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic properties on
which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease." "Refractory"
means, according to the Oxford Dictionary, "not yielding to treatment." AIDS answers precisely
to that description.
On September 24, 1986, the Daily Telegraph reported from Washington,
"Enough of a debilitating virus to infect the whole world,
disappeared from an American germwarfare laboratory five years ago, and
has never been traced, an environment group claimed yesterday in a
Washington Court action aimed at halting biological weapons research." In 1968, the J.D. Bernal Peace Library organised a
conference on the dangers of biological warfare research.
said then that among the weapons being stockpiled were some designed to
bring about genetic changes.
He said the "doomsday bug was under
wraps" and that there was a conspiracy of silence about germ weapons
because the implications were so frightening." He told the British
Daily Mirror after his address that "somewhere in the world a germ is
being cultured to which we would have no natural resistance and to which
there would be no sure defence."
A precise description of AIDS.
The British Observer, on June 30, 1968, quoted from an article in the
Journal of General Microbiology by W.D. Lawton of Fort Detrick, and R.C.
Morris and T.W. Burrows of the British microbiological research station at
One paragraph said, "By engineering the genetics of individual
strains, microbiologists aim to produce a single strain containing the
most deadly combination of properties." Again, a description of AIDS.
The article says that at that time Porton, according to the government,
was concerned only with defence applications of research, but Fort Detrick
was only committed to developing microbiological weapons for offence.
The Japanese carried out germ warfare research in occupied China during
the war. Some of these criminals were captured by the Soviets and duly
tried and sentenced. Others were given immunity by the Americans and taken
to work at Fort Detrick. In 1969, after the AIDS virus was loose,
negotiations began on a Convention banning biological weapons, and it came
into force in 1972. In its first review conference in 1980, it was
reported that 80 countries had ratified.
But there is no provision in the Convention to ban research or for
verification. Nichola Sims, who has written a book on biological
disarmament, wrote recently, "the failure of the Convention to impose
any restrictions even on 'offensive' biological warfare research, has been
frequently criticised." And she refers to popular fears that a
"super germ breakthrough in the means of waging biological or toxin
warfare is just around the corner and may induce the possessor of such a
germ to break out of the Convention." She quotes Dr. Robert K.
Mikulak of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency for the statement
that "there is no justification for classified military research on
the question in any country." But so far there is no inspection or
A much more recent accusation against
the United States for the manufacturing of the AIDS virus comes from the
Libyan UN Ambassador, Mr. Ali Ahmed Elhouderi. On January 9, 1992, at a
press conference, he stated that the AIDS virus was produced in a
laboratory probably as a weapon.
He said, "We think it is man-made and it was done in laboratories.
And it was not, as suggested, coming from monkeys in Africa." He also
suggested that the virus had been manufactured at the time of the Vietnam
These statements fit perfectly into place as research would have been
carried out at that time at Fort Detrick for offensive purposes against
the North Vietnamese.
all the circumstantial evidence, the layman will almost certainly reject
the idea that the escape of the man-made AIDS virus was the result of a
disastrous error during innocent civilian research. We can assuredly
conclude that it was the result of germ warfare research, and the finger
of guilt points to the United States.
The scientists could not have
visualised that they would let loose a so-far incurable disease that may
and possibly will wipe out millions, particularly in the Third World,
where the majority of the world's population lives. Never was the need
greater for the nations to drop their differences and to concentrate all
their skill and resources in a world-wide battle against this terrible
threat, and to end the horror of germ warfare research.
Mystery of Skull Valley
- By NIKOLAI FILIPPOV
of an error made by an airman testing a new germ weapon, a deadly virus
attacks the population of a small town in highland Utah, USA. An incurable
disease begins to kill people like a plague epidemic.
In an attempt to cover up the traces of their crime, the military
authorities artificially cause a landslide that buries the town and doom
chance survivors to lifelong isolation.
This is the plot of Vector, a novel by Henry Sutton, an American author.
This book is based on dramatic events during which the victims were
fortunately not people but animals. March 14-20, 1968 was a black
week for American farmers grazing sheep in the remote pasturelands of
semi-desert Skull Valley, Utah. About 6,500 sheep died there in those
seven days under mysterious circumstances.
Even more of a mystery was that people, cattle and other animals in the
area were unscathed. Everybody - farmers, residents of Utah,
journalists - felt certain that the accident was linked to the US Army
chemical and bacteriological testing ground in Dugway with an area of
several thousand square kilometres in the vicinity of Skull Valley. Indeed, at that very time the thousands of Dugway employees were carrying
out large scale experiments in preparation for further escalation of the
chemical war and the start of a germ war in Vietnam. For a whole
year the Defence Department emphatically denied that animals in Skull
Valley were being affected by the chemical or biological agents
disseminated in the atmosphere during the test. In an attempt at a
cover-up, experts at the proving ground advanced hypotheses which must
have seemed untenable even to laymen about the sheep having been killed by
poisonous plants or a natural epizootic.
However, an inquiry by Utah authorities in collaboration with
veterinarians and health experts compelled the Pentagon to admit its
responsibility for the death of the sheep. Even so, no one at Dugway was
The blame for a terrible crime posing a real threat to people's health due
to a gross violation of safety standards in conducting tests was placed on
an unfortunate accident.
According to the official version formulated under the direction of the
U.S. military authorities, a test of TMU-28/B spray tanks with nerve agent
VX, was carried out at Dugway on March 13, 1968.
The gas was dispersed from an F-4E jet bomber by means of two spray tanks
with a total capacity of 1,200 litres.
The bomber flew at an altitude of
40 to 45 m. During the test something went wrong with one of the tanks (or
so the version ran), and besides, the direction of the wind varied, with
the result that part of the nerve gas was carried beyond the proving
A cloud of aerosol VX allegedly contaminated pasturelands on an
area of 400-500 sq. km.
Skull Valley was not the only area where sheep
died, for a cloud of aerosol VX reached Res Valley, killing sheep 70 km
away from where the poison gas had been released. Anyone who has
read publications dealing with the accident in Skull Valley and Res Valley
is bound to detect a contradiction between the military authorities'
version and the facts.
The Pentagon has yet to explain why a
whole year passed before it made up its mind about what chemical or
biological agent caused the death of the sheep outside Dugway. If the
Dugway test had to do only with VX, then that gas was the only cause of
the sheep's death and this could have been stated at once.
There is reason to presume that over a short period experiments were
carried out at Dugway involving a whole range of poison gases and
biological agents. But it is logical to suppose that even in such a
contingency experts should know well the properties and casualty effects
of the test materials. And this implies that researchers must have had no
difficulty in ascertaining the nature of the agent which killed so many
The official story of the experiment of
March 13, 1968, says that the wind carried beyond Dugway, in the form of
vapours and highly dispersed aerosol, a mere nine kg, or 0.8 per cent, of
the total amount of VX gas to be dispersed.
Field chemical control cannot
ensure such a degree of accuracy. But the authors of the version needed to
cite some figure in order to make people believe that the sheep had been
killed by a nerve gas.
At the same time, the Pentagon wanted to conceal from the public the real
danger posed by chemical weapon tests in the atmosphere to residents of
Utah and so it withheld information about the actual amount of gas
released over Skull Valley.
The Pentagon officials suggested that
the contamination level in the Skull Valley pastureland where deaths
occurred among sheep averaged a mere 0.02 gram per hectare.
Let us note by way of comparison that to kill humans, it would be
necessary according to U.S. data available to disseminate from one to
three kilograms of VX per hectare of target, or 100 thousand times more
than the contamination level in Skull Valley given in the official version. Reports said that in a flock totalling 2,800
sheep, 2,500 or 90
per cent, were killed.
No such effect is possible where the VX
contamination level is 0.02 gram per hectare. A publication put out
by the Dugway proving ground said that during the test on March 13, 1968,
the greatest distance at which VX drops spilled on the ground had been 5.4
km and not 70 km, as the official version would have it. The Pentagon's
information on one and the same fact varies from document to document and
from period to period. Surely this shows that the version is false.
A contaminated cloud spreading wide in the atmosphere only retains vapours
and minute particles of aerosol which do not settle on the ground and can
be inhaled. It follows that had such a cloud really floated over Skull
Valley, it would have caused inhalational casualties in other animals as
well, including cattle and horses, but no such thing happened, according
to documentary evidence. In the early days after the accident,
before the hypothesis about VX was advanced, doubts were expressed even by
Brig. Gen. William Stone. He rightly asked why the gas had only killed
sheep without affecting people.
There were also other moot points. Why
were the diseased sheep shot dead ?
Why was no attempt made to save them by evacuating them to an
uncontaminated area or by treating them with atropine or other antidotes?
Marr Fawcett, a veterinarian of Utah, refused to believe that the sheep
had been poisoned with VX, for in that case many of them could, in his
opinion, have been saved by means of antidotes.
Dr. Kent Van Kampen,
a veterinary pathologist in Utah, said in April 1968, shortly after the
accident, that as early as March 17, 1968, the supposition that the sheep
had been hit by a chemical poison affecting the nervous system could have
been refuted without difficulty since all symptoms of such poisoning were
The death of an animal poisoned with a nerve gas such as VX is accompanied
by spasms and paresis of muscles in the limbs. Yet judging by what sheep
herders said in the early days of the inquiry into the accident, dying
sheep had shown no signs of spasms. True, later on someone saw to it that
a videotape recording allegedly illustrating the Skull Valley accident was
projected widely. The tape showed the death of a single sheep shaking with
spasms as a group of civilians looked on.
One year after the
accident, Kent Van Kampen and Marr Fawcett contributed in collaboration
with other experts of Utah an article to the Journal of the American
Veterinary Medical Association setting out the causes and circumstances of
the sheep's death in Skull Valley, their version tallying with the
Pentagon's. There was a footnote saying that in writing their article, the
authors had enjoyed expert assistance (it is easy enough to guess what
kind of assistance) in particular from Dr. Mortimer Rothenberg, the
science director at Dugway, and Dr. Bernard MacNamara of Edgewood Arsenal,
the chief U.S. Army centre for the development of chemical and germ
We might as well note at this point that shortly after the sheep's death
in Skull Valley Dr. Rothenberg, trying to exonerate Dugway from blame for
the accident, declared that the symptoms displayed by the sheep had
nothing whatever in common with those of nerve gas poisoning. And
so, it took the Pentagon a year to invent an explanation for the sheep's
death and make the civilian experts mentioned above present its version as
their own, thereby striking a bargain with their conscience.
which showed a sheep's death from VX was intended to serve the same
But the forgery was too crude for knowledgeable people to mistake
it for the truth.
They realised at once that the "documentary"
showed a sheep injected with a nerve gas by means of a syringe, that is,
in the same way as this is done in demonstrating the effect of nerve gases
They deduced this from the absence of any other living or dead sheep on
the screen as well as from the presence of people wearing no gas masks or
protective clothes, whereas safety regulations forbid anyone to enter
without taking these precautions in an area contaminated by VX to a degree
There is no such ban where a poison gas is injected into the body of an
animal outside a contaminated area.
A further fact worthy of note is that the worker's teams which buried the
dead sheep had no gas masks on, judging by other videotapes and various
photographs. This is permissible only when the nature of an agent which
has caused the death of animals is known for certain. Furthermore, it is
necessary to note that the agent used was completely harmless to humans.
This detail, like the others cited above, indicates that the sheep in
Skull Valley were killed by something other than nerve gas. The
death of livestock so far away from the testing ground, as in the case of
Skull Valley, could only be caused by a biological agent. Experts could
establish without difficulty that nine litres of biological agent is
enough to generate a pathogenic aerosol cloud five km long, two km deep
and 100 m high. One litre of aerosol cloud could contain several hundred
units of pathogen.
Such a cloud can sail many dozens of kilometres without losing its
casualty effects. Consideration of the death rate of biological agents
during the drift of aerosol particles in the atmosphere makes no
difference as far as the main conclusion is concerned. Poison gas
tests according to regulations in force at Dugway are generally conducted
in the morning to ensure that enough daylight remains for collecting data
on the results of tests and cleaning the test site.
The dissemination of VX on March 13, 1968, is alleged to have been carried
out one hour before sunset.
Evening experiments are particularly typical in the case of biological
agents, for researchers are careful to preclude the disastrous impact of
sunrays on pathogens. The year 1968, when the Skull Valley accident
occurred, has gone down in history as the peak of U.S. chemical warfare in
Vietnam, Laos and Kampuchea.
In thelate 1960s, the Pentagon worked at a frantic pace to develop new
chemical and germ weapons.
A report by the House Committee on Science and Astronautics said that in
the years preceding the accident, the Pentagon had been engaged in a vast
programme for germ weapon testing. The tests were conducted at several
military testing grounds, on ocean islands, in the Panama Canal zone,
Alaska, New York City and San Diego as well as on airfields, in subways
and on highways. The Dugway test made on March 13, 1968, or somewhat
earlier could be one of those tests.
It is reasonable to suppose that
during that test use was made of biological agents based on a virus
selectively killing sheep without doing any harm to humans. It could be visna, a virus which has been intensively studied since the late 1950s in
several research centres, including Fort Dettrick, Maryland, then the main
U.S. centre for the development of germ weapons.
No visna-caused diseases
have been recorded among humans.
This virus hardly affects cattle, horses or other animals. Its properties
in this respect coincide entirely with those of the agent responsible for
the Skull Valley accident in 1968.
Visna affects the central nervous system of sheep, robbing their body of
immunity. The symptoms are progressive weakness, shortness of breath, a
wobbly gait, sagging withers and a drooping head. The end affect is
paresis and paralysis of the skeletal muscles and then death. Similar
symptoms were registered in sheep affected with the Skull Valley disease.
The disease caused by visna is incurable. This explains why the epidemiological service of Utah did the
right thing by deciding to slaughter the diseased sheep.
No antidotes could have helped the animals in the least and were not used,
either. If during the March 1968 tests at Dugway visna was used as a
simultant modelling the properties of germ weapons, it is clear why the
men who buried the dead sheep used no gas masks or protective clothes,
since visna is harmless to man.
And this invites another conclusion: at that time, the nature of the agent
which affected the sheep was known to at least a small group of people in
charge of removing the effects of the accident.
The establishment of investigation committees was merely designed to
conceal the real objectives and tasks of the Dugway experiments from the
public. The mystery of those criminal experiments has begun to come
to light in recent years. Competent scientists consider that visna was
used in the United States for genetic engineering work which resulted in
creating HIV, a chimeric virus causing an incurable infectious disease of
man known as AIDS.
Research into HIV at the molecular level has shown that
60 per cent of its genome is identical with that of visna and the rest is
a built-in nucleotide sequence isolated from the genome of another
HIV, or the pathogen of AIDS, was designed in U.S.
genetic engineering laboratories on instruction from the Pentagon.
The purpose of this virus is to augment the U.S. germ (biological) warfare
potential by acquiring a capability for depriving an enemy population of
vitally important immunity at the threshold of a major or local armed
The conclusion about the complicity of the U.S. military
authorities in the appearance of AIDS, the new dangerous disease which
affects humans, is shared by John Seale of Britain, Jacob Segal of Germany, Robert Strecker of the United States and other noted scientists
and experts who have carefully analysed available scientific data.
New Dawn Vol.2, No.1]
For the time being, they have discounted the events and facts connected
with the Skull Valley accident. Nevertheless, they have come to the
unanimous conclusion that in designing HIV visna was made use of. Dr.
Seale has said that a scientist who wanted to evolve a virus capable of
destroying man's immunity system and provoking a disease similar to AIDS
would have to resort to visna.
The "patent" for inventing HIV should be issued to the United
States because it was there that the virus was developed and also because
Americans were the first victims of AIDS. The disease, which broke out in
New York, was carried to other big cities in the United States and then to
other countries and continents. Its virus was transmitted by infected
Americans serving at overseas military bases.
Besides, AIDS was contracted in the United States by Australian and
European tourists vacationing there. HIV spread to Middle East and other
Arab countries which imported blood from donors stricken with AIDS.
In October 1986, John Seale quoted during an interview with the Guardian
an extract from a report prepared by the Pentagon in 1969.
It said that in
the next five to ten years an infective micro-organism might be evolved
that would differ substantially from all pathogens known so far. Its most
important property, the report said, would consist in attacking the immune
system and internal organs on which the ability of the human body to
resist infectious diseases depends. Consequently, the AIDS pathogen was
deliberately created and development was planned and funded.
The test at Dugway which killed so many sheep in Skull Valley turned out
to be part of the Pentagon's programme for designing a new biological
agent, the AIDS pathogen.
As Biological & Psychological Warfare
- By WAVES FOREST
is hard to imagine that a cure for AIDS would be withheld for economic
Could there be some other motive ?
Despite repeated denials from Defense Department officials, allegations
persist that AIDS is a genetically altered virus, which has been
deliberately released to wipe out homosexuals and/or non-whites in the
U.S. and reduce populations in Third World countries. At first
glance it seems like the epitome of paranoia to accuse the military of
conspiring to exterminate citizens of their own country, and even some of
their own troops. However, the vast majority of military personnel could
be completely unaware of such a plot in their midst, while a relative
handful of traitors in key positions could conduct it under cover of
classified operations. And the circumstantial evidence is actually quite
compelling, that the AIDS virus was artificially engineered, and planted
in several different locations at about the same time through vaccination
programs, and possibly blood bank contamination.
At a House Appropriations hearing in
1969, the Defense Department's Biological Warfare (BW) division requested
funds to develop through gene-splicing a new disease that would both
resist and break down a victim's immune system. "Within the next 5 to
10 years it would probably be possible to make a new infective
micro-organism which would differ in certain important respects from any
known disease-causing organisms.
Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the
immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain
our relative freedom from infectious disease." (See A Higher Form of
The Secret Story of Chemical and Biological Warfare by R. Harris
and J. Paxman, p.266, Hill and Wang, pubs.)
The funds were approved. AIDS appeared within the requested time
frame, and has the exact characteristics specified.
In 1972, the World Health Organisation
published a similar proposal:
"An attempt should be made to ascertain whether viruses can in fact
exert selective effects on immune function, e.g. by... affecting T cell
function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should also be
looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired
if the infecting virus damages more or less selectively the cells
responding to the viral antigens." (Bulletin of the W.H.O., vol. 47,
p.257-274.) This is a clinical description of the function of the AIDS
The incidence of AIDS infections in Africa coincides
exactly with the locations of the massive W.H.O. smallpox vaccination
program in the mid-1970's (London Times, May 11, 1987).
Some 14,000 Haitians then on UN secondment to Central Africa were also
vaccinated in this campaign.
Personnel actually conducting the vaccinations may have been completely
unaware that the vaccine was anything other than what they were told.
A striking feature of AIDS is that it is ethno-selective.
The rate of infection is twice as high among Blacks, Latinos and Native
Americans as among whites, with death coming two to three times as swiftly. And over 80% of the children with AIDS and 90% of infants born
with it are among these minorities. "Ethnic weapons" that would
strike certain racial groups more heavily than others have been a
longstanding U.S. Army BW objective. (Harris and Paxman, p.265) Under the
current U.S. administration biological warfare research spending has
increased 500 percent, primarily in the area of genetic engineering of new
The "discovery" of the AIDS virus (HTLV3) was announced by Dr.
Robert Gallo at the National Cancer Institute, which is on the grounds of
Fort Detrick, Maryland, a primary U.S. Army biological warfare research
Actually, the AIDS virus looks and acts much more like a cross
between a bovine leukemia virus and a sheep visna (brain-rot) virus,
cultured in a human cell culture, than any virus of the HTLV3 group.
The closest thing in this case to a "smoking test tube" so far
is the AIDS virus itself.
If it was possible for such a monstrosity to occur naturally it would have
done so ages ago and decimated mankind at that time. Some other life form
would presently be in control of this planet (assuming that is not already
The Hepatitis B vaccine study in 1978 appears to have
been the initial means of planting the infection in New York City. The
test protocol specified non-monogamous males only, and homosexuals
received a different vaccine from heterosexuals.
At least 25-50% of the
first reported New York AIDS cases in 1981 had received the Hepatitis B
test vaccine in 1978.
By 1984, 64% of the vaccine recipients had AIDS, and the figures on the
current infection rate for the participants of that study are held by the
U.S. State Department of Justice, and "unavailable."
The AIDS epidemic emerged full-blown in the three U.S. cities with
"organised gay communities" before being reported elsewhere,
including Haiti or Africa, so it is epidemiologically impossible for
either of those countries to be the origin point for the U.S. infections.
Another indication AIDS had multiple origin points is that the 14-month
doubling time of the disease cannot nearly account for the current number
of cases if we assume only a small number of initial infections starting
in the late 1970s. Before dismissing the possibility that a U.S.
Army BW facility would participate in genocide, bear in mind that hundreds
of top Nazis were imported into key positions in the U.S.
military-intelligence establishment following WWII. U.S. military
priorities were then reorientated from defeating Nazis to
"defeating" communism at any cost, and strengthening military
control of economic and foreign policy decisions. (See Project Paperclip
by Clarence Lasby, Atheneum 214, NY, and Gehlen: Spy of the Century by
E.H. Cookridge, Random House.)
There's no proof those Nazis ever gave up their longterm goals of conquest
and genocide, just because they changed countries. Fascism was and is an
international phenomenon. It's not as if this was a total reversal of
previous U.S. military policy, however. Hitler claimed to have gotten his
inspiration for the "final solution" from the extermination of
Native Americans in the U.S.
For that matter the first example of germ
warfare in the U.S. was in 1763 when some of the European colonists gave
Indians a number of blankets that had been infected with smallpox, causing
One indication of the actual U.S.
military priorities regarding BW was the importation of the entire
Japanese germ warfare unit (#731) following WW II. These people killed
over 3,000 POWs, including many Americans, in a variety of grisly
experiments, yet they were granted complete amnesty and given American
military positions in exchange for sharing their research findings with
their U.S. Army counterparts.
Consider also the callous attitude displayed by top military officials
toward veterans suffering from the after-effects of exposure to Agent
Orange and radiation from nuclear weapons tests. In fact, since the
end of WW
II over 200 experimental BW tests have been conducted on civilians and
military personnel in the U.S.
One example was the test spraying from Sept. 20-26, 1950 of bacillus
globigi and syraceus maracezens over 117 square miles of the San Francisco
area, causing pneumonia-like infections in many of the residents.
The family of one elderly man who died in the test sued the government,
but lost. To this day, syraceus is a leading cause of death among the
elderly in the San Francisco area. Another case was the joint Army-CIA BW
test in 1955, still classified, in which an undisclosed bacteria was
released in the Tampa Bay region of Florida, causing a dramatic increase
in whooping cough infections, including twelve deaths. A third example was
the July 7-10, 1966 release of bacteria throughout the New York subway
system, conducted by the U.S. Army' Special Operations Division. Due to
the vast number of people exposed it would be virtually impossible to
identify, let alone prove, the specific health problems resulting directly
from this test.
Despite the loyalty of the vast majority of U.S. military personnel toward
their country, there are clearly some military officials who have very
different intentions, and they occupy high enough positions to impose
their priorities on military programs and get away with it, so far.
The first detailed charges regarding AIDS as a BW weapon were published in
the Patriot newspaper in New Delhi, India, on July 4, 1984. It is hard to
say where the investigations of this story in the Indian press might have
led, if they had not been sidetracked by two major domestic disasters
shortly thereafter: the assassination of Indira Gandhi on Oct. 31 and the
Bhopal Union Carbide plant "accident" that killed several
thousand and injured over 200,000 on Dec. 3.
Apparently, homosexuals were an initial target in the U.S. because their
sexual practices would help in the rapid spread of the disease, and
because it was correctly assumed that very few non-homosexual citizens
would pay much attention during the early years of the epidemic.
Also, the stigma of a "homosexual disease" would interfere with
rational analysis and discussion of AIDS.
Bear in mind that homosexuals were among the first to be exterminated in
Nazi Germany, before Jews and other minorities, so fewer citizens would
object. The details of precisely how the AIDS virus was
mass cultured, and spread by incorporating it into vaccination programs
are available but fairly intricate.
Evil is hard to confront, especially on
the preposterous scale we have here. If you acknowledge the presence of
those who think their only hope for survival is to kill off two thirds of
all the other kinds, and their ability to manage it, you then pretty much
have to do something about it.
Abridged from Now What #1.
The North American-based Nation of Islam (NOI) led by Minister Louis
Farrakhan launched an offensive in its battle against the deadly
"man-made" AIDS virus during its recent Saviours' Day weekend.
following report is courtesy of The Final Call.
From the rostrum of Christ Universal Temple here, the Honorable Louis
Farrakhan announced that the NOI has acquired exclusive distribution
rights to the AIDS fighting drug Immunex, an oral alpha-interferon
treatment developed in Kenya.
"I just got a call from our chief
of staff 3 minutes before I came on the rostrum," Minister Farrakhan
said, regarding the confirmation of the Immunex agreement that came from
Leonard Muhammad in Kenya. "The Nation of Islam is announcing to you
that we have the exclusive distribution rights of Immunex throughout the
United States of America. "As of this day," he continued,
"Min. Alim will still teach, but he is now the Minister of Health and
Human Services for the Nation of Islam."
Dr. Alim told the cheering
audience that the war against AIDS is being won but total victory will not
come "until we deal with those responsible for making the AIDS
Since the early 1970s under the Nixon administration, he said, the
official policy of this government has been to commit genocide against
non-white people around the earth.
That policy continues under the administration of President George Bush,
he said. Dr. Muhammad and former Final Call Editor-in-Chief Abdul
Wali Muhammad were sent to Kenya by Minister Farrakhan last year on a
fact-finding tour regarding the drug Kemron. While there, the NOI
representatives learned about Immunex.
Both drugs have shown remarkable effects in relieving AIDS symptoms, but
the drugs have received very little media coverage in the U.S.
"We would like FDA approval," said Min. Farrakhan, "however
we can't wait.
We will take any risk, bear any burden to free our people of a man-made
disease designed to kill us all.
"The Minister added that the drug will be offered to all who need it
"regardless of race, creed or colour."